🚨I DEBATED @Deenresponds ON THE DILEMMA IN FRONT OF 1200 PEOPLE.🚨...

He came in hot and cocky...HE LOST BADLY.
1. 🙊The Making of the Ad Hoc "Conscious Edits" Refutation (2025)🙊
For those unfamiliar, this is a brand-new attempt, put together in 2025, to counter the Islamic Dilemma argument.
For centuries, classical Muslim scholars have argued that the original Torah and Injil were lost and that Christians and Jews no longer possess them.
Then along comes Deen with a convenient change of strategy:
"We're changing our position. The Torah and Injil aren't lost after all. You actually DO have them, but they're still corrupted!"
So we've gone from "You don't have the original scriptures" to "You do have them, but they've been consciously edited."
And just like that, a new ad hoc defense is born, conveniently designed to escape the Islamic Dilemma rather than resolve it.
And there you have it.
If no biblical evidence could ever prove your explanation wrong, you haven't demonstrated your refutation. You've insulated it from criticism.
That's the circularity I was exposing.
Deen claims the Quran consciously edits embarrassing biblical stories because prophets cannot commit major sins or be dishonored. He even argues that intentionally angering Allah is a MAJOR SIN.
Well, Deen, you took the bait. 🎯
Deen came with - my BFF told me...but the truth was far from is claim
🔥 Six leading AI engines were used to evaluate our Islamic Dilemma debate.
🥊 The AI scorecards favor JAY over DEENRESPONDS!
🏆 Six AI evaluations. One debate. Watch the results and judge for yourself!