🚨 SHOCKING DEBATE: #IslamIsToast - Watch @DeenResponds desperately...

🚨 SHOCKING DEBATE: #IslamIsToast - Watch @DeenResponds desperately try to manufacture Muhammad in the Bible and use Daniel 2/7

🔥Debate Background: Deen is desperately trying to fit the Stone being "cut without hands" into ISLAM and Muhammad

#CHRISTIANS PAY ATTENTION! (READ)
👉Before we get to the goalpost shifting, listen carefully to how Deen FIRST defines Daniel’s 5th kingdom.
1⃣It is very physical.
2⃣Islam is the kingdom that allegedly destroyed Rome.
3⃣It is the Muslim Empire.
4⃣It rules land.
5⃣It has authority on earth.

👉And Deen says that as long as Muslims are ruling on earth, they fulfill the criteria for the Kingdom of God.

Good. ✅Keep that definition in your pocket.

Because watch what happens when Mike starts testing it against Daniel.

The “kingdom” is about to become a lot more flexible. 😂

🚨Now watch Deen’s first definition get tested.🚨

👉Deen says the Stone being "cut without hands" simply means the kingdom was established / instituted by God.

🔥Mike immediately points out the problem.
1⃣Jeremiah 27:6 says God gave the lands to Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon.

- So Babylon was also given its kingdom and authority by God.

💥That means "established by God" cannot be the thing that uniquely identifies Daniel’s Stone.

2⃣If your definition also applies to one of the kingdoms the Stone is supposed to replace, it doesn’t distinguish the Stone at all.

And this is where things start getting interesting…

Because Deen’s definition is about to change.

🚨And here comes the first Muslim-shift.🚨

🔥Mike has just shown that “established by God” cannot uniquely identify Daniel’s Stone, because Deen himself admits God also established pagan empires.

🤣Deen literally concedes:
"He established all those empires. Obviously, that’s not what I meant."

So Deen, what does “instituted by God” mean NOW?

Suddenly it means God:
🤔favors this kingdom,
🤔wants it to succeed,
🤔wants it to propagate His message,
🤔and its people are upon His deen- His religion.

Deen finishes by calling it: "A godly nation."
🚨Notice what just happened.🚨

The original definition was: Established by God.

Mike showed that also applies to Babylon.

👉So Deen's new definition became: Established by God + favored by God + succeeds + spreads God’s religion.

That isn’t a clarification of the original criterion. That is a new criterion added after the first one failed. And now the obvious question becomes:

PSST- Where does Daniel actually give us these added conditions?

🔥Now Mike calls it out directly.🔥

👉Deen’s original claim was: "Cut without hands" = established by God.

✅Mike points out that Babylon was also established and empowered by God.

Deen changes the definition.

Watch the progression in definitions from Deen:
➡️Established by God
➡️ Favored by God
➡️ Made to succeed
➡️ Spreads God’s message
➡️ Rules by God’s law/religion

👉That is not one definition being clarified. That is a definition being expanded every time the previous one fails.

💥And the obvious question is still the same:
Where does Daniel say any of this?

💥Mike has just exposed the problem with Deen’s first definition.💥

Deen said the Stone being "cut without hands" means its kingdom was instituted by God.

But Mike pointed out that God also gave Babylon its kingdom and authority to Nebuchadnezzar.

So "established by God" cannot uniquely identify Daniel’s Stone.

Now watch what Deen adds to the definition.

God:
"favors His kingdom"
"wants His kingdom to succeed"
and wants it to "propagate His message."

🚨Okay-but now ask the obvious question:

Where does Daniel say that "success" or "propagation" identifies the Stone?

🚨Plenty of empires became enormously successful and spread their language, laws, institutions and worldview across the earth.🚨

👉The British Empire is an obvious example.

So mere success and global impact cannot identify Daniel’s Stone.

And if Deen now means: "No, I mean successful propagation of the TRUE religion…"

then he has simply added another condition: Islam must already be assumed to be God’s true religion.

But that is the very thing he is supposed to prove from Daniel. You cannot use "God approves Islam" as the criterion for proving that Daniel predicts Islam.

That simply assumes the conclusion

🚨Mike presses Deen on the obvious problem - If Daniel’s kingdom “shall never be destroyed,” what happened to the Islamic caliphate?

🗣️Deen answers: "I never defined it as the caliphate."
Then: "My definition is more expansive than a caliphate." A little later he says the kingdom is also: "defined by the religion."

🔥That is the issue.

For the conquest of Rome, Deen points to a physical Muslim empire.
👉But when permanence becomes the problem, the definition expands beyond the empire to Islam/the Muslim community.

So which is Daniel’s kingdom? The empire-or the religion?

🚨SUMMARY CLIP shows how Deen is a walking "bait-switch-distraction guy" who is willing to commit shirk to one-up Christians, in his mind...and it comes naturally to him.
At this point, just listen to Deen’s own words.

The definition keeps changing:

Instituted by God
→ Favored by God
→ Made to succeed
→ Propagates God’s message
→ Rules by God’s law/religion
→ More expansive than a caliphate
→ Defined by the religion
And when challenged:
"That’s not what I meant."
"I never defined it as the caliphate."
"My definition is more expansive…"

This is the entire problem in one clip.