61+ tweets and threads that can help you get better at conflict:...

(Consider this thread a growing library on the topic)🧵
1) Find an aspect of conflict that is challenging for you (facing it? resolving it? standing up for yourself? decreasing reactivity?)
2) Scroll through thread to find things that address it.
3) Test during next conflict, bookmark thread for later.
1) Things that help before conflict.
2) Meta-skills that improve our conflict skills.
3) Communication during conflict.
4) Reactivity.
5) Resolution.
(Anything I add after today won't be sorted.)

but in long run it’s really how you handle misunderstandings, conflict, confusion, disagreement that go the distance
Before seeing the other as an enemy, it’s a good idea to get clear on the true nature of the conflict.

Yet if you look closely, most aren't actual conflict:
1) Misunderstanding
2) Affirming our worldview
3) Unacknowledged impact
4) Resentment for unmet needs
5) Pure projection of another conflict
6) Actual conflict (irreconcilable interests)
The conflict is happening inside us and our feelings about the conversation are conflated with our feelings about the person.

*tough in the way a good hike can be described as tough
- Improve our relationship?
- Win this dispute?
- Be heard?
Sure, conflict avoidance isn’t always a great pattern. But pick your battles.
Conflict can be taxing. Know why it matters to you & if it’s of service.
“I want to have this conversation with you because our relationship is important to me.” feels much less than an attack or a threat of abandonment.

Step 0 is self-regulation.
If there's an inner conflict or struggle within yourself, that's the 50% you bring into the interaction.
If the other person has the same issue, now you have 4 or more parts in conflict. Rather than 2.
(This doesn’t mean everything needs to be addressed with the other person.
The feelings can be reconciled within yourself too. But it’s helpful to know what you’re choosing.)

Either the conflict plays out between people, or it plays out silently inside one of them.
One option isn't always "better" compared to the other.
But either way, it will continue to look for resolution until it's given the space.

It can help to establish a shared reality/intention first.
- What do we both agree on?
- What makes us treasure this relationship?
- If things would get heated, which desired outcome do we share?
(Don't just fight for its own sake. Find little things that bother you & address them. Progressively pick harder things.
You can use the rest of this thread to also learn to resolve the fights.)

I’ve always been a super agreeable person & it’s harmed me in so many ways.
So this year I want to experiment with overcorrecting & picking fights- basically practicing “disagreeable-ness”.
check them out here ⬇️
Observe how it feels to do this. What feelings come up when you give yourself full permission to STFU?

me: knowing when to stfu
friend: LOL what?? but you never stfu
me: 😂 right, that’s how it looks like to you. Online you can play dozens of hands simultaneously. But you don’t see the hands I fold. I fold hands better than you
friend: 🤔


Before conflict, you don’t know where each other’s edges are. Is it true alignment—or people-pleasing with resentment brewing?
Conscious, non-destructive conflict can demonstrate your differences are respected

The potential gift of increased self-awareness for all parties.
Revealing parts of us that long to be felt, acknowledged and healed.
Using this technique helps you find those gifts and unwrap them.

Here’s a thread on why that happens, how to build self-respect without losing care for others—and be kind without betraying yourself 🧵

🧵 for @threadapalooza
Higher capacity to feel =
* Lower reactivity
* Grounding for the other
* Lower chances of perceiving conflict where it isn’t

Building the capacity to feel.
So many issues across life are downstream of low feeling capacity that I think this should be core curriculum.
Here's why it matters and how to practice it: 🧵
If we are in conflict with reality too, conflict keeps compounding.
(Btw, if you’re reading this thread you will probably enjoy following Ann & checking out her work in general.)

E.g.
We can complain that the other person should be fighting differently, but the reality is that they’re behaving the way they are.
Now it’s up to us to respond wisely.

And if we want the next moment to be different, we must first collaborate with the current one.
(Which includes our unwillingness to do so, as that is part of the moment.)
Whenever possible, have your conflict face to face.


So when someone starts arguing with you, it's useful to assume a misunderstanding & get curious about their perspective.
If it is, now you can collaborate to find clarity.
If it's an actual conflict, you'll find out too
When both people are fighting to be heard, nobody gets heard.

Sounds familiar?
I got you.
A thread on becoming a top-tier listener🧵
I recommend Defender’s “Anatomy of an Internet Argument” series to dig into clear examples of this.

Generally speaking, conflict benefits from suspension of the idea that we understand, and curiosity about how the other person sees things.


But here's one thing most of them have in common:
They meet the other person in their world:
🧵


x.com/not_a_hot_girl…
But most people don't voice what they care about. They argue at the level of strategy (HOW to care for it) & make an enemy of those opposing the strategy.
The underlying concerns are often compatible, but left unexplored. Find what you care about.

Figuring out if you're both fighting about the same thing.
Just because we use the same words doesn't mean we attribute the same meaning to those topics.
Getting clear on underlying values & needs is crucial, and often already the solution.
You can use your emotions to understand what it is you care about, and communicate that directly.

All emotions offer love, wisdom & power in their own way.
Once you allow them to do so, everything changes.
How to find the love inside your feelings:
🧵

This causes us to miss deeper intimacy and see conflict that isn't always there.
A thread about “undamning”—and why I think everyone benefits from learning it🧵

Some call it a weakness or energy drain, others an essential trait.
The confusion stems from fuzzy or conflated definitions.
A thread on what empathy is (and isn't) 🧵

Owning your experience.
This is often dismissed as therapy speak.
But in reality, it’s more about changing how you relate to things than how you phrase them:🧵

One way to resolve this is to establish a shared reality in which both co-exist.
For example:

Because these phrases—in that situation—embody their exact opposite.
Energetically, they're saying: "Don't be the way you are right now! It's wrong!"
What you can do instead:
1) Regulate yourself first
2) Welcome their experience as valid
3) Nonverbally invite them to follow you (voice tone, body language)
If step 3 doesn't help, there might be a dissonance in energies (e.g. they feel annoyed that you're so relaxed about the situation which prompted their panic).
In that case it can be beneficial to meet them at their level of energy first.
But doing so will still be a lot easier to navigate when you put on your own oxygen mask first.

Afraid of getting yelled at → acts slippery/dismissive/defensive → the other person yells to be heard
Afraid of losing → dominates and pushes people → loses their trust, generosity, cooperation

It baffles me that this isn’t taught in schools.
A thread on the basics, and how this awareness can save you from unnecessary drama or inner tension: 🧵

Pausing.
Just a fraction of a moment.
Before speaking, to digest what you heard & your internal response to it.
Before action, to notice the intention that gave rise to it.
1 conscious breath to move from conditioning to choice🧵

When we allow our inner peace to depend on something being true or false, we are not willing to face its truth without bias yet.

...but did you know it’s just one piece of a larger, often dysfunctional dynamic, and it rarely exists in isolation?
This is the Drama Triangle—and how to transcend it: 🧵

The aspects of you that make you feel most like an individual are the ones that exist because of other people.
Here's why (and how you can use this to resolve conflicts or unblock stuck patterns)🧵

But while those concepts are found in many spiritual traditions, the part of his work that really rocked my world is one I rarely see referenced:
Collective pain bodies🧵

Every fight was stuck. I couldn’t be vulnerable, couldn’t be seen, couldn’t feel what my triggers were asking me to feel.
Why?
Because I was too busy trying to stay above it.

Both partners seek to understand and collaborate with the other. Deep trust, blissful intimacy (feels like love).
If neither partner seeks to understand, the relationship devolves into avoidance or war.
If one person seeks to understand while the other is defensive or dismissive, the understanding partner suffers greatly, in turn creating suffering in the defensive person. This continues to devolve unless both partners change course.
Strategy: Armoring oneself *seems* like a good move but actually isn't - it leads to certain failure. Being understanding but receiving dismissal in return is the worst outcome and a good place to bow out if possible.



(And if you pay close attention, is subtly shifting during almost every interaction.)

Should a newspaper try to be consistent with past news?”
- Derek Sivers

Even if you just make these by yourself it can be useful.


It's natural to focus on what the other side should do differently (after all, you're in conflict).
But a more empowering (and often more helpful) place to start is to find what your part is, and what you can do with that.

But here's an entirely different, surprisingly powerful perspective I rarely see discussed: 🧵

Love is epistemologically necessary.
🧵
Skilled manipulators with bad intent can do harm in ways that look well-intended.
But if bad vibes aren’t allowed, many people with good intent will respect that, which often stops them from responding.
This applies to 1:1 interactions too.

- Good faith actors must hide their dark side which gives it free reign to act in sneaky/covert ways
- Bad faith actors w. dark triad traits can easily invade, prey on, or control the space without facing confrontation

At the end of each fight, play an accountability game. Take turns naming things you’re responsible for regarding the argument that just happened. After each one, take a shot.

“One thing I learned from you today is…”
You can always decide you’re no longer in for the type of argument that’s happening.

“Hm, maybe you are right.” (And maybe you are a fool.)
“Hm, not sure. what do you think?”
“Hm. I’ll have to think more about that.”
“Hm. That’s interesting. Let me get back to you.”

You can handle:
- forgiveness
- dropping your resentment
- letting go of "winning" the fight
- starting over with love & compassion
- leaving something that doesn't serve you


It's hard to know whether the connection is 100% genuine, until you’ve had a moment of meeting each other’s capacity for disconnect.

peptalksblog.com/how-to-turn-co…
peptalksblog.com/what-if-you-we…

1) Which feelings drove me?
2) What was my (real) intented outcome for the conversation?
3) Which needs, boundaries or values was I protecting?
4) Do I know which ones they were protecting?
5) How might we have honored everyone involved?
In fact, even a neutral, silent observer can benefit the conflict. Because it makes everyone show up differently.
- Steelman vs. Strawman
- Awareness of power dynamics (using power responsibily)
- Emotional Aikido
Might write these myself someday. But today is not that day. Maybe you know someone who already did?
(Feel free to add your wishlist too.)
Sometimes where the conflict jams is that the styles themselves are in conflict.

But what if they could be doorways to deeper intimacy and wisdom?
A thread harvesting the gold from your triggers (in 7 steps)🧵
So it’s not always possible to reach mutual understanding.
Pay attention to your idea of a good outcome for conflict (eg. Understanding).
Can you identify other good outcomes that don’t include it?

- Reference scales: 1 person's peak happiness is another's bad mood
- Amount of duality distinctions: 1 can obsess over something that for another doesn't even exist
The initial impact of your words may not be the same as the long-term impact.
- Something may arouse anger initially but benefit the person overall
- Something may increase peace in the conflict but not in the long-term relationship
Think long-term too.

It might just be amazing when looked at on a longer timeline.
Winning arguments sometimes means losing them.
May we always find truth within the context of love.

You gained a silent enemy.
Conflict doesn’t have to be problematic.
If you see it as life unfolding, it takes some of the weight off.

Align moral grammar.
(In general: comparing definitions is useful.
It’s not uncommon for people to think they have a problem with each other when it’s just 1 or 2 words they use a lot & define differently.)

Resolution begins only when both parties can name the moral grammar they’re using."
Argue compassionately.

Sometimes, what seems to be a series of conflicts is simply 2 people who are not fully compatible but desire to make it so.

turns out it's easy if you: actually like each other, have the same values + goals, and trust the other has your back. embarrassingly low bar, and yet.
Step 1 is shifting stance.

Argue over 1 topic at a time.

Make sure the conflict is indeed interpersonal, not intrapsychic.

Translate to the other person’s verbal preferences if needed.

Treat feelings like feelings, facts like facts, and don't succumb to the temptation to use one to invalidate the other.
(QT is a beautiful example of doing this well!)

I told my beloved that I felt betrayed by him for something recently
it wasn't rational. it wasn't proportionate. it wasn't “fair”
but it was deeply felt (on my end)
and very painful
and instead of shutting me down or getting defensive, he listened
and saw me
Invite a mutually known and trusted third party.












