Advice on flirting is all over the place. But most of it has 1...

But most of it has 1 thing in common: It tells you to do things a specific way.
The problem? The same behavior that has 1 person swooning over you would make another run for the hills.
How flirting actually happens: 🧵
But about playing with tension & aiming to hit the edge of pleasure for everyone involved.
What does this mean? ↓↓
Implicit flirting brings tension through ambiguity ("Did I read that right? Were they signaling?")
Explicit flirting brings tension through challenge ("How do I respond to that? Did anyone notice?")
Both have limits:
If you flirt too explicitly, it can become vulgar or violent.
What's "too much" depends on everyone's capacity for tension, awareness of context, and preferences. ↓↓
Context includes more than the immediate situation (e.g. "strangers at a busstop").
Cultural, societal, aesthetic, professional, etc. are all factors that contribute.
Things often get awkward when a factor is obvious to 1 person but ignored by another.)
You dance together in the tension & try for each step to hit the spot that feels most pleasurable or interesting—while avoiding boredom, overwhelm or lack of safety.
(This spot changes each moment)

Resisting my urge to go “She once said __ feels __, and __ means __” but trying to feel her energy, trust it, & see responses as feedback to what’s happening this moment.
Why I do it?
1) Love. I can see she feels more loved & at ease when understood without having to explain herself. Or when needs are anticipated.
2) Novelty: I get to rediscover this amazing person ln each new moment.
3) Hard to explain briefly but when I don’t attune, it easier for me to slip into manipulative patterns and/or fall prey to them from others. I don’t think that serves anyone.
4) Feels like dancing. Dancing feels good lol.
1) There's no Right Way™. You can flirt jokingly, seriously, shyly, cheesily, dangerously, apologetically,...
2) If there was a Right Way™ , it would kill the tension. There'd be 0 uncertainty.
3) Repeating the same "move" would lead to boredom (end of flirting).

They want their words to "work"—to say the right thing that gets the “right” response.
But if that's the goal, we’re not connecting. We’re controlling—trying to shape behavior instead of letting the other person be them↓↓
1) Dances start with invitations (which can be implicit or explicit too).
2) There are contexts in which dancing is a bad idea, or has consequences.
Also:
The more risqué the flirting, the more attuned it must be (to both the person and the context).
But when lacking attunement, this can make people feel unsafe.
IMO, better to err on the side of safe & lean into progressive risk while developing attunement.
1) A great way to create tension is to verbally decline an invitation & test if they're attuned enough to spot your bluff.
2) If you think you're spotting a bluff but it was actually a rejection, it creates a dangerous dynamic↓↓

Here's what I learned about rejection: 🧵
But it can also be a soft no because the other person is in a state of collapse.
Which is why I believe we should only flirt as risky or boldly as we are attuned & willing to take responsibility↓↓

That’s when we fall into their shadows:
– Posture: the appearance of dignity through force or arrogance
– Collapse: distorted humility rooted in self-denial or defeat
↓↓
(Once again, if it would ensure this, it would kill the tension.)
But it does mean that if this happens, we can spot it & re-calibrate↓↓
The reality that both people can respond negatively & back out at any moment.
If that reality is not present, there's either an imbalance of power or some objectification going on.

The mind replacing the human with a means to an end.
It's not just a sexual thing that happens because of depravity, it's extremely common in everyday interactions between well-meaning individuals:
x.com/peptalksblog/s…
Feel free to add your own:

You can just flirt as a gift for them to enjoy that process while making it very clear you do not intend on taking it any further.)


No strings attached. Zero expectations. Watch how doors open for you.
I’m sitting in a diner, cutting it up with the bartender, stacking playful questions and one-liners like lego blocks. He goes “You made this morning fun. Your meal is on the house.”
Great songs often flirt with familiarity & surprise.
Too familiar? Bland.
Too much surprise? Disorienting/overwhelming.
Parallel with attunement here:
"Too much" depends on what the listener is familiar with, not the music itself.

Creepy flirting aims to extract it.
These palpable intentions determine more than the observable content of the interaction.

This is a beautiful lens to view joy and many other positive qualities through.
Joy, love, sacredness: instead of extracting them from the world, we seek to imbue the world with them.
We shine these qualities on the world so the world becomes painted in their colors.
We can enjoy, enloven and ensacralize the world without waiting for it to bend into a shape we consider worthy of joy, love and worship.


Most people’s flirting can be improved by increasing the amount of ambiguous phrases.


E.g. An indicent proposal requiring more than 1 person can energetically be an invite:
"I'm enjoying how my energy responds to yours, want to join the enjoyment?"

2) Invitation: “I’m doing this. You in?”
3) Proposal: “How about doing this?”
4) Inquiry: “What do you want to do?”
The sweet spot in many contexts is 2 or 3.
They fully respect people’s freedom without burdening them with all the responsibility.



