Did you know that the most widely taught feedback method actually...

A thread on what to do instead🧵
1) Take a piece of constructive criticism.
2) Slap a compliment before and after to make it more palatable.
In my experience, it's best to avoid this technique entirely. Here’s why:
People can't know if the compliment was genuine or just something you mustered up for the sandwich.
And since it might be the latter, the candor of the criticism can no longer be trusted either↓↓
1) They're 66% praise.
2) People remember the start & end of a story more than the middle (primacy & recency effects)
Odds are they think it was a nuanced compliment. & if not:
Because they presume the other person lacks the maturity to handle straight feedback—that we need to sugarcoat it, like feeding vitamins to little kids.
(This presumption can be correct, but there's a better way:)
"Hey, I have some feedback for you. You open to hearing it right now?"
(You can also specificy whether it's about affirmation, improvement, or a complaint.) ↓↓
- Constructive criticism in the presence of co-workers or employers differs from that feedback given privately, because its impact goes beyond the feedback itself.
- Heightened emotional states can make feedback harder to process↓↓
Situation - Behavior - Impact
E.g.
"When (thing happened) and you (did thing) I (had experience/felt feeling)."
It may seem like in many cases this wouldn't apply, but it does—and there's a reason it's more helpful. Examples:
When you (did thing), I felt less engaged. By the end, when you (did thing), I felt my focus come back.
Feedback on work:
When you (did thing), (metric) went down, so (other department) had to work hard to compensate.
Why is SBI feedback most helpful?↓
Giving good advice requires an understanding of what the other person is trying to achieve (and what they value).
But sharing how something impacted you is insightful, no matter who you are & what you know:
“I felt reluctant to buy because (thing) made me think (doubtful thought)” is extremely useful feedback that requires no marketing experience.
Specific feedback is more constructive & actionable (even if it's just affirmation).
Personal feedback is more conducive to connection (even if it is not positive)↓↓
1) "Feedback without impact is just opinion."
2) "Don’t give drive-by feedback"
What's drive-by feedback? You ask.
Asking how your words landed isn’t just a form of emotional care, it’s also feedback on your feedback.
…which is the best way to get better at giving it.↓↓
(Besides criticism, it's quite common for people to have trouble processing praise.)
If this feel cumbersome, you might ask yourself:
Am I seeking to:
- Empower them (e.g. reveal their blindspots, affirm their strengths, offer wisdom)?
-
- Tear them down (e.g. "to be honest, your thing sucked")?
-
- Feel superior (e.g.: flash knowledge, unsolicited advice,evaluation)?↓↓
While usually not intended as such, it can feel like a power move.
The framing creates potential for a subtext that we have higher authority to evaluate them.
Sticking to the "impact model" avoids this dynamic↓
Because often, what seems to be about the other person ("this song sucks", "this is bad government") is really about the intersection between 2 people ("music doesn't match my taste", "good governing that negatively impacts me").
Sometimes the kindest feedback is silent & clear.
(In the same way, every response—or lack thereof—you get is feedback from life. Life always speaks to you. And you can listen, even if the feedback is not verbalized).
Get them in your inbox for free by singing up here👇
peptalksblog.com/subscribe
If you think others could benefit from this thread, I'd deeply appreciate you sharing the first post:
When in doubt, or if it’s the first time, I also like to lean into asking.