🧵 YouTube loves copycats. Every big creator on YouTube is copying...

But there's a MASSIVE problem with this approach.
It's that YouTube doesn’t care about originality, it cares about proof. The algorithm doesn’t take risks on untested formats. It plays favorites with what already works. If you look around, the biggest channels didn’t win because they invented something brand new. They won because they took proven ideas and executed them better.
What made him stand out was scale and execution. He looked at formats that were already like the last person to leave, survival challenges, game-style competitions and simply did it on a bigger budget, with higher stakes, and cleaner packaging.
That’s copying strategically.
He didn’t reinvent anything new, he just refined and scaled it.
He just produces it at scale with relentless consistency.
Again, it’s not new, it’s strategic copying with his own twist.
Viewers want the videos to be entertaining, engaging, and easy to consume.
Proven formats already check those boxes, so just replicate them, don't make your job harder.
It’s not an accident. It’s the algorithm showing that people want more of that exact thing. Creators who rush to replicate are simply feeding the demand. Creators who resist and try to be original get left behind.
> What topics create repeatable success?
> What title formats show up again and again?
> What thumbnails are getting clicked most in my niche?
> How do the top 1% creators hook viewers in the first 30 seconds?
Pick the top 5–10 direct competitors in your niche. Create a system to track them (Notion, Google Sheet, whatever works).
Every time they upload, log the title, thumbnail style, topic, and performance. Over time, patterns will emerge and you’ll see exactly what’s clicking with viewers.
Don’t just copy everything. Look at their last 20 uploads and isolate the 2–3 that significantly outperformed the rest. Those are the outliers.
Ask yourself why those worked. Was it the packaging? The topic? The stakes? The format length? This is where you’ll find which part of the video actually made the difference.
Every time you see a successful format or title, add it to a “bank”. This is your personal swipe file of proven YouTube content.
Over weeks and months, you’ll build a massive list of ideas with actual evidence that they work. When you need your next video idea, you don't need to spend hours, you can pull from the bank.
This is the part where people misunderstand copycat strategy. You don’t carbon copy. You take the skeleton of the format and make your own version. Change the context, add your personality, raise the stakes, shift the angle.
For example: if your competitor did “Surviving 24 Hours With Only $1,” maybe you do “Surviving 48 Hours With Only $1 In [specific country]” It’s familiar enough for viewers to click, but unique enough to be yours.
You should now be doing this for all of your new uploads. You have to feed the algorithm what it already knows people want until you become the authority in your space. That’s how you win long term.
Here’s the irony is that everyone they look up to had to blend in first and copy other people before they could stand out.
Once you’ve built leverage, once you’ve become the niche leader, then you can experiment and innovate. Until then, put your ego down and start replicating what's already working.
That is how EVERYONE else succeeded on YouTube, and that's the only way you can succeed.




