Most relationship advice focuses on the people inside the...

But here's an entirely different, surprisingly powerful perspective I rarely see discussed: 🧵
But that doesn't mean the relationship itself is healthy.
It's not uncommon for couples to feel satisfied while their relationship quietly deteriorates:
Here's why:
Seeing the relationship itself as a separate entity.
It has its own needs, desires, and boundaries—separate from what you each want individually (though there's often plenty of overlap).
Here are some ways to apply this:

There's you, your partner, and the relationship you're in.
Each have their own needs, boundaries and desires (which constantly impact each other's).
It's common sacrifice one (or more) for the others.
The best choices honor all three.
Consult the relationship as a third person in your decisions:
"OK, we're both on board with this. But how will our relationship be impacted? What does it want?"
Play a game where you take turns trying to tune into how your relationship is feeling:
"Right now, our relationship seems to feel ____"
(Horny, bored, grieving, expansive, childlike, playful, stuck...)
Have a conversation where you narrate the phase your relationship is going through.
- Where does our relationship seem to want to go right now?
- What is it not in the mood for lately?
- What does it want us to do more of?
- How is it growing up & developing?
Get to know the preferences of your relationships:
- What activities does our relationship love, even if they're not our personal favorites?
- If our relationship had a love language, what would it be? How does it differ from ours?
- What makes it come alive?
Sure, maybe your partner doesn't know. But the relationship definitely knows. Its entire nature has changed.
(Relationships can get traumatized too.) ↓↓

And whether lying is moral… well, it depends on your beliefs and values.
But here’s a selfish argument why you better stick to the truth in relationships, no matter what those beliefs or values are.
A group of 3 friends? That's actually 7 entities:
3 individual people
3 pair relationships
1 group dynamic
This is group chemistry can be so complex (& electrifying). ↓↓
Wild to think about! Adding 1 person to a group of 5 is adding 6 new relational entities into the mix, with their own needs, desires and personalities.
No wonder groups are often instinctively protective against newbies! ↓↓
If this perspective shifted something for you, I'd love it if you helped me out by reposting this thread.
Follow me @peptalksblog for more insights on connection🙏
But voicing their relationships is something I don't recommend exploring without a trained facilitator.
Just wanted to share it for anyone interested in going down a rabbit hole.
The relational entities aren't just between you and another person, but between the roles you occupy for each other.
(I'll write a thread about people vs role relationships some other day—huge topic in itself.)
x.com/MattPirkowski/…
So instead of "me and you" being one interpersonal entity, it's already a collective.

In fact, we shift between these identifications all the time:
Sometimes you on behalf of a particular part of yourself.
Sometimes you speak as you, the country, the company, the ethnicity, the twitter subculture, the egregore.
All have different relationships with other relational entities.
peptalksblog.com/what-if-you-we…
