📄The 'prescriptive acceleration' from Marx, one ought support free...
𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘶𝘴@_bonaventurian
15 views
Sep 23, 2025
~6 min read
Advertisement
1
📄The 'prescriptive acceleration' from Marx, one ought support free trade to create conditions for revolution is naive consequentialism. Land rightly flipped this to 'descriptive': acceleration: the process of fragmentation.
Proclus: death is a reduction of a thing to its parts
Proclus: death is a reduction of a thing to its parts
2
To use the topical example: This appears, and it does actually then prescind from moral licitness somewhat, to be the reason for supporting Newsom.
How do we reduce ZOG hegemony to its parts? It is either way headed in this direction. How will the world be unshackled quicker?
How do we reduce ZOG hegemony to its parts? It is either way headed in this direction. How will the world be unshackled quicker?
3
The argument then is that "Trump and voting red will not ultimately preserve the US against it but it does perhaps slow this fragmentation. So vote Newsom."
My rejoinder is that democratic participation actually has no substantial bearing on the longevity of the American Empire.
My rejoinder is that democratic participation actually has no substantial bearing on the longevity of the American Empire.
4
So much for the topical and trite example, let's demonstrate the point: that democratic participation actually has no substantial bearing on the longevity of the ZOG and the American Empire.
5
i) Whatever does not possess causal efficacy with respect to a thing’s essential principle of endurance cannot substantially affect the longevity of that thing.
6
ii) Democratic participation does not possess causal efficacy with respect to the United States' essential principle of endurance.
∴ Democratic participation cannot substantially affect the longevity of the American Empire.
∴ Democratic participation cannot substantially affect the longevity of the American Empire.
7
The major premise i) is merely sound ontology and can be treated as a given.
8
The minor premise ii) is all too applicable to the US, even if not universally so, due to geopolitical, financial, and military hegemony, which operates independently of electoral processes and "popular consent".
9
I mark out "popular consent" because it has inefficacious influence on ZOG hegemony even if we concede that popular consent isn't itself downstream from power, and especially so in mass democracy with over a century of psychological warfare waged on its own populace for control.
10
We can give further demonstration that democratic participation does not possess causal efficacy with respect to the ZOG's essential principle of endurance.
11
Firstly: a) That which is constituted and maintained principally by financial, military, and institutional oligarchies is not substantially altered in its existence by the participation or non-participation of the general populace in periodic elections.
12
The United States is constituted and maintained principally by financial, military, and institutional oligarchies. Therefore, the United States is not substantially altered in its existence by the participation or non-participation of the general populace in periodic elections.
13
Examples of such structural ZOG oligarchical rule are overwhelming.
14
Defence policy and foreign intervention are driven by a self-perpetuating nexus of the Pentagon, defence contractors (Lockheed Martin, Raytheon), and congressional committees, regardless of party.
15
US military engagements (Libya, Syria, Yemen, Ukraine, esp. Israeli support) proceed in roughly the same manner under both Democrat and Republican administrations. Clear is the independence of the national security apparatus from electoral outcomes. Putin is right about as much.
16
Federal agencies (DoJ, State Department, CIA, NSA) possess operational autonomy and continuity that does not meaningfully change across elections. The Church Committee (1975) already noted the CIA's capacity to act without executive knowledge or oversight. This one is obvious.
17
Cooperation between state agencies and private platforms (Twitter, Facebook, Google) to regulate political discourse (cf. Missouri v. Biden suit, Twitter Files) clearly shows a technocratic stratum exercising effective control irrespective of "democracy".
18
International Finance is were this is brutally plain.
19
Consider the federal reserve and treasury. Monetary and fiscal policy is controlled by an insulated network of private banking interests and Treasury officials (Goldman Sachs alumni, typically Jewish, routinely occupying Treasury and Fed posts), not by democratic mandate.
20
And VERY plainly Citigroup / BlackRock policy capture.
2008 bailout (TARP) and the 2020 C19-response facilities were directly designed in consultation with and largely for the benefit of major Jewish financial institutions.
2008 bailout (TARP) and the 2020 C19-response facilities were directly designed in consultation with and largely for the benefit of major Jewish financial institutions.
21
Further, just look at the logic of it.
How does voting take place? Through information recieved from without about political events. Where does such information come from to the voter?
From and through all of the above and the media class which itself is Jewish.
How does voting take place? Through information recieved from without about political events. Where does such information come from to the voter?
From and through all of the above and the media class which itself is Jewish.
22
So the information typically given to the voter to place people in power through the publicly conferred right to supposedly exercise political power, grounded in the alleged consent of the majority as expressed through democratic procedures...
23
...is itself down stream from those in actual political power.
Entirely circular.
None of this is to say that anyone supporting Trump-Vance or Newsom doesn't already recognise this.
Entirely circular.
None of this is to say that anyone supporting Trump-Vance or Newsom doesn't already recognise this.
24
But anyone who actually wants to be free of ZOG has to concede the only way out to be institutional collapse on a mass scale. A kind of cataclysm or catabolic collapse which is entirely extra-democratic.
25
Unlike Weimar Germany, where parliamentary fragmentation prevented any one bloc from controlling the state...
26
The current US oligarchical structure takes its foundation in stable, cross-partisan control by Jewish financial, military, and administrative elites, meaning the system persists regardless of electoral volatility (no real "regime crisis").
27
To return to Land's language: there are ways out, an "exit", but I will not be examining them in detail on twitter. At best I can provide this diagnosis.
28
I mentioned in passing catabolic collapse. I want to refocus on this as at least one of the "exit" strategies that I can speculate about openly on twitter.
ecoshock.org/transcripts/gr…
ecoshock.org/transcripts/gr…
29
Catabolic collapse is the process by which a complex system, when overstressed, begins to break down its own structures to sustain itself.
30
Instead of maintaining growth, it consumes its remaining infrastructure, leading to progressive fragmentation and decline rather than sudden implosion.
Though this isn't out of the question.
Though this isn't out of the question.
31
And with that we return to a structural consideration of acceleration as a descriptive process. But it is not an acceleration that is headed anywhere, and it is ex natura rei.
32
Catabolic collapse threatens US hegemony (*possibly*) ex natura rei because the empire's structural maintenance (military bases, financial networks, administrative apparatus) requires continual surplus extraction.
33
As fragmentation and fiscal strain increases, it must cannibalise its own infrastructure, accelerating systemic decay.
34
When external surplus dwindles, the system still requires high upkeep. Without new inputs, it reappropriates internal assets (pensions, public goods, infrastructure etc.,) to sustain operations, thereby consuming itself.
35
I have an intuition to this but nothing wholly demonstrable. One clear sign of this was how Federal Reserve had to lend multiple trillions of dollars during the pandemic.
36
To put it in frame: emergency fiscal resources were channelled primarily to financial markets, rather than hospitals and civil infrastructure, effectively reallocating internal social capital to sustain the hegemonic core.
37
This is how ever fiscal crisis appears to be dealt with in the US, by hollowing itself out (2008 is another great example).
38
So perhaps following Marx's line if we concede his logic, one should be supporting the kinds of fiscal decisions which lead to bailouts and internal capital reallocation.
I don't usually do political/economic threads but a few things have been on my mind.
I don't usually do political/economic threads but a few things have been on my mind.
39
Please go in for critique I do say this all quite tentatively.
/fin
/fin
