1/5 Mearsheimer said NATO provoked russia. He claimed Putin didn’t...

@joni_askola
Joni Askola@joni_askola
43 views Jun 28, 2025 ~1 min read
Advertisement
1
1/5 Mearsheimer said NATO provoked russia.

He claimed Putin didn’t want Ukraine.

Now Putin says Ukraine is russia.

Mearsheimer wasn’t just wrong—he gave cover to a war of conquest
Media image
2
2/5 His ”realism” only sees russian interests.

No room for Ukraine’s sovereignty.

No respect for its people’s choices.

That’s not realism. That’s imperial nostalgia in disguise
Media image
3
3/5 He mocked Ukraine’s resistance.

Ignored russia’s failures.

Dismissed Ukrainian voices.

His predictions didn’t just miss—they erased reality
Media image
4
4/5 Mearsheimer treats Putin’s ideology like strategy.

But this war isn’t about security.

It’s about domination and russification.

And calling it ”realism” doesn’t make it any less brutal—or any more legitimate
Media image
5
5/5 His takes aren’t analysis—they are apologism.

Mearsheimer’s framework excuses aggression and silences victims.

He’s not a neutral scholar.

He’s a propaganda weapon. And people are dying because of it
Media image
Actions
What You Can Do
  • Export as PDF or Markdown
  • Batch Export to Notion
  • Bookmark & Highlight
  • LinkedIn & Instagram Carousel Maker
Create Free Account

Includes 7-day Premium trial

Advertisement