They do this to protect Commie Mamdani, cuz he is a settler...
Spencer Pratt@spencerpratt
66 views
Sep 07, 2026
~1 min read
Advertisement
1
They do this to protect Commie Mamdani, cuz he is a settler colonialist. He comes from a wealthy Indian colonizer family in Uganda, where a <1% Indian aristocracy has taken over 65% of banking, manufacturing, and land ownership. The Mamdanis stole the country from 53M Africans.
They don’t want you talking about how 35K Indians seized control of Uganda because that would force them to confront how full of shit they are. But remember, they don’t have any morals, they just want power. It’s not hypocrisy, it’s hierarchy. If they make the “sin” entirely about white people, then it gives them the ability to commit whatever they think is a crime (when you do it) so they can continue to take power away from you.
They don’t want you talking about how 35K Indians seized control of Uganda because that would force them to confront how full of shit they are. But remember, they don’t have any morals, they just want power. It’s not hypocrisy, it’s hierarchy. If they make the “sin” entirely about white people, then it gives them the ability to commit whatever they think is a crime (when you do it) so they can continue to take power away from you.
Stu Smith@thestustustudio
🚨 Socialism 2026 Panel Debates Whether “Settler Colonialism” Is Too Imprecise and Needs to Be “White Settler Colonialism”
At Socialism 2026’s “Ocean Deep Solidarity: Reparations, LANDBACK, and Collective Liberation” panel, Raven Schwam-Curtis invokes @UVA professor Tiffany King for some galaxy-brain theorizing over whether “settler colonialism” is simply too imprecise.
The argument is that Black people and white settlers should not be treated as structurally equivalent in relation to Indigenous dispossession, so perhaps the more precise term is “white settler colonialism.”
And yes, Tiffany King is one of my “favorite” radical professors, so I was delighted to see her get a shoutout.
At Socialism 2026’s “Ocean Deep Solidarity: Reparations, LANDBACK, and Collective Liberation” panel, Raven Schwam-Curtis invokes @UVA professor Tiffany King for some galaxy-brain theorizing over whether “settler colonialism” is simply too imprecise.
The argument is that Black people and white settlers should not be treated as structurally equivalent in relation to Indigenous dispossession, so perhaps the more precise term is “white settler colonialism.”
And yes, Tiffany King is one of my “favorite” radical professors, so I was delighted to see her get a shoutout.