This is not serious journalism. š§µ @NRC prefers to attack NGO...
NGO Monitor@NGOmonitor
120 views
Apr 27, 2026
~1 min read
Advertisement
1
This is not serious journalism. š§µ
@NRC prefers to attack NGO Monitor rather than face the truth: Hamasā own documents show how the terror group controlled, monitored, and exploited Gaza aid operations, including NGO networks involving @oxfamnovib. >>
x.com/nrc/status/204ā¦
@NRC prefers to attack NGO Monitor rather than face the truth: Hamasā own documents show how the terror group controlled, monitored, and exploited Gaza aid operations, including NGO networks involving @oxfamnovib. >>
x.com/nrc/status/204ā¦
2
.@NRC claims we provided no āhard evidence,ā ignoring our extensive research ā covered in @telegraaf article ā on Hamasā own documents describing an @oxfamnovib Gaza agriculture project in an area Hamas described as āsecurity sensitiveā due to its use of it for military activity.
The project was implemented by a local Hamas-linked contractor (Rai-Consult). >>
The project was implemented by a local Hamas-linked contractor (Rai-Consult). >>
3
Why didnāt @NRC show interest in the evidence that Hamas operated a KGB-style system designed to infiltrate and control the entire aid sector in Gaza? These āguarantorsā were embedded inside NGOs, including @oxfamnovib, and through them Hamas monitored and steered activity. >>
4
.@NRC argues NGO Monitor is ānot independentā because government officials reference our research. In reality, we meet with officials from dozens of governments, including š³š±, to improve funding accountability. That reflects the relevance of our work, not a lack of independence. >>
youtube.com/watch?v=MizeEuā¦
youtube.com/watch?v=MizeEuā¦
5
.@NRC should have scrutinized @oxfamnovib, a recipient of š³š± govāt funding, for its role in projects and partnerships described in Hamasā own documents. Instead, it repeats ad hominem claims while ignoring detailed evidence of Hamasā control over NGO activity and aid operations. >>
