A new longevity stem cell therapy in monkeys showed an estimated...

Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson
86 views
Oct 04, 2025
~2 min read
2
What researchers did: engineered human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) with a modified FOXO3 gene (FOXO3SA2/SA2) to resist degradation.
These hESCs were then differentiated into senescence-resistant mesenchymal progenitor cells (SRCs). When injected into cynomolgus monkeys (2 million cells/kg) across various age groups, SRCs demonstrated significant rejuvenation, reversing brain atrophy, blood senescence, inflammation, and oxidative stress.
Transcriptomic and epigenetic analyses confirmed biological age reversal in organs like skin, aorta, lungs, and the digestive system.
FOXO3-enhanced senescence resistant MPCs (SRCs) consistently outperformed wild-type MPCs, producing systemic rejuvenation across brain, blood, and organs.
On average, this corresponded to estimated 3β5 years of biological age reversal, across 54% of tissues (vs 31% with WTCs). Scaled cautiously to humans, this may approximate ~9β15 years of rejuvenation.
These hESCs were then differentiated into senescence-resistant mesenchymal progenitor cells (SRCs). When injected into cynomolgus monkeys (2 million cells/kg) across various age groups, SRCs demonstrated significant rejuvenation, reversing brain atrophy, blood senescence, inflammation, and oxidative stress.
Transcriptomic and epigenetic analyses confirmed biological age reversal in organs like skin, aorta, lungs, and the digestive system.
FOXO3-enhanced senescence resistant MPCs (SRCs) consistently outperformed wild-type MPCs, producing systemic rejuvenation across brain, blood, and organs.
On average, this corresponded to estimated 3β5 years of biological age reversal, across 54% of tissues (vs 31% with WTCs). Scaled cautiously to humans, this may approximate ~9β15 years of rejuvenation.
3
Here are some of the effects in more detail.
SRCs = are special stem cells engineered with a FOXO3 tweak that makes them resistant to aging
WTCs = are the normal βwild-typeβ cells without that upgrade
Brain
+ Cortical thickness and volume restored toward youthful levels: SRC up to ~50β70% vs WTC ~10β20% (inferred from imaging and figure analysis; not direct author statistics).
+ Hippocampus sn-transcriptAge: SRC β2.5 years (WTC not reported).
+ Cognition: significant improvement with SRC; modest effect with WTC.
Blood / Immune
+ Age-related gene programs reversed: SRC 39% (upregulated) / 30% (downregulated); WTC reversed fewer (Fig. 2CβD, no exact percentages reported).
+ Equivalent immune rejuvenation: SRC 3 years vs WTC 1.5 years (observational estimate, not author statistic).
Organs (transcriptomic & epigenomic)
+ Average transcriptomic rejuvenation: SRC β3.34 years (54% of tissues) vs WTC β2.80 years (31% of tissues).
+ Standout tissues:
β’ Skin: SRC β5.6 years vs WTC β4.4 years
β’ Lung: SRC β4.1 years vs WTC β3.3 years
β’ Skeletal muscle: SRC β4.9 / β3.5 years vs WTC β3.2 / β2.4 years
β’ Spleen: SRC β2.6 years vs WTC β1.9 years
β’ Hippocampus: SRC β2.0 years vs WTC β1.5 years
+ Reproductive system: Ovaries SRC β4.5 years vs WTC β3.1 years; granulosa cells showed >6 years reversal with SRC.
+ DNAmAge: Brain β5 years, skeletal muscle β4 years, spleen β2 years with SRC; WTC changes negligible.
Safety
+ Dose: 2 million cells/kg IV biweekly for 44 weeks.
+ No fevers, immune rejection, or metabolic issues in either group.
+ No tumors at the primate dose of 2 million cells/kg, or even at 10Γ higher dose (20 million cells/kg) in nude mice.
SRCs = are special stem cells engineered with a FOXO3 tweak that makes them resistant to aging
WTCs = are the normal βwild-typeβ cells without that upgrade
Brain
+ Cortical thickness and volume restored toward youthful levels: SRC up to ~50β70% vs WTC ~10β20% (inferred from imaging and figure analysis; not direct author statistics).
+ Hippocampus sn-transcriptAge: SRC β2.5 years (WTC not reported).
+ Cognition: significant improvement with SRC; modest effect with WTC.
Blood / Immune
+ Age-related gene programs reversed: SRC 39% (upregulated) / 30% (downregulated); WTC reversed fewer (Fig. 2CβD, no exact percentages reported).
+ Equivalent immune rejuvenation: SRC 3 years vs WTC 1.5 years (observational estimate, not author statistic).
Organs (transcriptomic & epigenomic)
+ Average transcriptomic rejuvenation: SRC β3.34 years (54% of tissues) vs WTC β2.80 years (31% of tissues).
+ Standout tissues:
β’ Skin: SRC β5.6 years vs WTC β4.4 years
β’ Lung: SRC β4.1 years vs WTC β3.3 years
β’ Skeletal muscle: SRC β4.9 / β3.5 years vs WTC β3.2 / β2.4 years
β’ Spleen: SRC β2.6 years vs WTC β1.9 years
β’ Hippocampus: SRC β2.0 years vs WTC β1.5 years
+ Reproductive system: Ovaries SRC β4.5 years vs WTC β3.1 years; granulosa cells showed >6 years reversal with SRC.
+ DNAmAge: Brain β5 years, skeletal muscle β4 years, spleen β2 years with SRC; WTC changes negligible.
Safety
+ Dose: 2 million cells/kg IV biweekly for 44 weeks.
+ No fevers, immune rejection, or metabolic issues in either group.
+ No tumors at the primate dose of 2 million cells/kg, or even at 10Γ higher dose (20 million cells/kg) in nude mice.

