1/ TIKTOK CAPTURE BY ISRAEL: CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION MOTIVE?...
Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯@BasedSamParker
103 views
Sep 24, 2025
~3 min read
Advertisement
1
1/ TIKTOK CAPTURE BY ISRAEL: CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION MOTIVE?
FACT: Charlie Kirk vocally opposed censoring Tiktok over anti-israel content, and specifically attacked Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL for trying to get hate speech censorship imposed on social media companies.
FACT: It was Greenblatt who helped lead the effort to force the sale of Tiktok to a consortium of pro-israel jewish billionaires just one week after Charlie was killed.
FACT: The White House has acknowledged the Tiktok algorithm will now be altered under the direction of its new pro-israel jewish owners.
FACT: Recapturing the support of Gen Z has been a top priority for israel since 10-7. "We have a major major major generational problem." - Jonathan Greenblatt
Given the lengths & efforts israel went to secure this acquisition—including getting Tiktok shut down—is it fair to wonder whether potentially fierce opposition from Charlie Kirk was a sufficient motivation for removing him, regardless of his otherwise generous support for israel?
You might say, "If israel needed the support of young people back, why would it get rid of its top supporter amongst the youth?"
Perhaps a comparison is in order: in his time, JFK was seen as a strong supporter of israel, a pro-israel zionist, and a stalwart ally to the jewish people—but, he had been engaged in trying to get the AZC (the forerunner of AIPAC) registered as a foreign agent lobby under FARA.
At the time, the American public barely noticed and little appreciated just how important the jewish/israeli lobby was seen by israel to its existence & future. It's now generally accepted by many that this effort to stop AIPAC was likely one of the motives behind israel's alleged role in the JFK assassination. We see now the stranglehold israel has on us through AIPAC, but the public didn't see or know back then what it would become.
Are we experiencing something similar with respect to Charlie Kirk & Tiktok? Something that doesn't look like a big enough deal to us now to merit assassination, but will end up being a much bigger deal in hindsight? We do know israel wants this Tiktok censorship & control at any cost. They see it as strategically vital to their existence and future. Any opposition from Charlie would have been seen as a threat. The only question is how big a threat?
Sadly, we'll never know how any opposition from Charlie over jewish/israeli censorship of Tiktok would have played out. That scenario died with him.
Cui bono?
FACT: Charlie Kirk vocally opposed censoring Tiktok over anti-israel content, and specifically attacked Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL for trying to get hate speech censorship imposed on social media companies.
FACT: It was Greenblatt who helped lead the effort to force the sale of Tiktok to a consortium of pro-israel jewish billionaires just one week after Charlie was killed.
FACT: The White House has acknowledged the Tiktok algorithm will now be altered under the direction of its new pro-israel jewish owners.
FACT: Recapturing the support of Gen Z has been a top priority for israel since 10-7. "We have a major major major generational problem." - Jonathan Greenblatt
Given the lengths & efforts israel went to secure this acquisition—including getting Tiktok shut down—is it fair to wonder whether potentially fierce opposition from Charlie Kirk was a sufficient motivation for removing him, regardless of his otherwise generous support for israel?
You might say, "If israel needed the support of young people back, why would it get rid of its top supporter amongst the youth?"
Perhaps a comparison is in order: in his time, JFK was seen as a strong supporter of israel, a pro-israel zionist, and a stalwart ally to the jewish people—but, he had been engaged in trying to get the AZC (the forerunner of AIPAC) registered as a foreign agent lobby under FARA.
At the time, the American public barely noticed and little appreciated just how important the jewish/israeli lobby was seen by israel to its existence & future. It's now generally accepted by many that this effort to stop AIPAC was likely one of the motives behind israel's alleged role in the JFK assassination. We see now the stranglehold israel has on us through AIPAC, but the public didn't see or know back then what it would become.
Are we experiencing something similar with respect to Charlie Kirk & Tiktok? Something that doesn't look like a big enough deal to us now to merit assassination, but will end up being a much bigger deal in hindsight? We do know israel wants this Tiktok censorship & control at any cost. They see it as strategically vital to their existence and future. Any opposition from Charlie would have been seen as a threat. The only question is how big a threat?
Sadly, we'll never know how any opposition from Charlie over jewish/israeli censorship of Tiktok would have played out. That scenario died with him.
Cui bono?
2
2/ Charlie was a huge fan of Tiktok and a very vocal critic of censoring it.
3
3/ In June, Charlie was excited that Trump had saved Tiktok from shut-down for another 90 days until September 17th.
Is the timing of Charlie's death & the Tiktok takeover just a coincidence?
Is the timing of Charlie's death & the Tiktok takeover just a coincidence?
4
4/ Jonathan Greenblatt called on their jewish brains to figure out how to recapture the youth.
In spite of Charlie Kirk's efforts at TPUSA, the youth were still straying. Keeping Charlie around was a net neutral decision. But opposition from Charlie over Tiktok censorship would have been a net negative.
In spite of Charlie Kirk's efforts at TPUSA, the youth were still straying. Keeping Charlie around was a net neutral decision. But opposition from Charlie over Tiktok censorship would have been a net negative.
5
5/ Pro-israel jewish billionaires will now control the algorithm and censorship on Tiktok. How do you think Charlie would have reacted to this? What would he have said to his college kids?
6
6/ Read more about how the public missed the jewish/israeli role the JFK assassination:
Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯@BasedSamParker
1/ "Charlie Kirk was a zionist and one of israel's strongest supporters, why would they kill him?"
Please allow me to explain why this isn't necessarily as robust a falsification of the "israel did it" theory as you might think. 🔖This essay thread.
When JFK was assassinated in 1963, no one suspected israel or jewry, nor did they for decades. Why? 3 reasons:
1. At the time, JFK was perceived as being a great ally to jews and a strong supporter of israel & zionism. This cannot be overstated. This would have been the position of regular people and insiders alike.
2. Certain aspects and motives we now ascribe to israel/jewry for being behind the assassination were mostly not known. (Ex: Nukes/Fight with David Ben-Gurion, Palestinian Right of Return, Withdrawal from Vietnam, James Angleton & his army of jewish spies, Yitzhak Rabin was in Dallas that day)
3. Certain aspects and motives that were known but not appreciated by audiences of the time to be as important as we now understand them to have been. (Ex: Jack Ruby, Jolly West, AZC/AIPAC/FARA Registration, Zapruder)
Applying the experience, it's possible the actual motives behind assassinating Charlie Kirk might not actually be known, yet, or they might be known and they don't seem as important to us Gentiles right now as they actually are. I submit that a surface-level understanding, or even a moderately critical view, of Charlie's known support for israel isn't nececssarily a sufficient test to rule out israeli/jewish involvement. That level of knowledge, analysis & understanding is why no one suspected jews/israel of being behind the JFK assassination for so long.
Let's look at that JFK case, now.
Please allow me to explain why this isn't necessarily as robust a falsification of the "israel did it" theory as you might think. 🔖This essay thread.
When JFK was assassinated in 1963, no one suspected israel or jewry, nor did they for decades. Why? 3 reasons:
1. At the time, JFK was perceived as being a great ally to jews and a strong supporter of israel & zionism. This cannot be overstated. This would have been the position of regular people and insiders alike.
2. Certain aspects and motives we now ascribe to israel/jewry for being behind the assassination were mostly not known. (Ex: Nukes/Fight with David Ben-Gurion, Palestinian Right of Return, Withdrawal from Vietnam, James Angleton & his army of jewish spies, Yitzhak Rabin was in Dallas that day)
3. Certain aspects and motives that were known but not appreciated by audiences of the time to be as important as we now understand them to have been. (Ex: Jack Ruby, Jolly West, AZC/AIPAC/FARA Registration, Zapruder)
Applying the experience, it's possible the actual motives behind assassinating Charlie Kirk might not actually be known, yet, or they might be known and they don't seem as important to us Gentiles right now as they actually are. I submit that a surface-level understanding, or even a moderately critical view, of Charlie's known support for israel isn't nececssarily a sufficient test to rule out israeli/jewish involvement. That level of knowledge, analysis & understanding is why no one suspected jews/israel of being behind the JFK assassination for so long.
Let's look at that JFK case, now.