YOU CAN'T TRUST BOTH TUCKER CARLSON *AND* NICK FUENTES. There's an...
Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯@BasedSamParker
83 views
Aug 15, 2025
~2 min read
Advertisement
1
YOU CAN'T TRUST BOTH TUCKER CARLSON *AND* NICK FUENTES.
There's an emerging narrative on the Dissident Right: that the conflict between @NickJFuentes & Tucker Carlson is just some kind of disagreement—as if they're arguing tax policy or something. Nothing could be further from the truth. You can't trust BOTH of them. Let me explain why:
▪️Tucker has repeatedly, over the course of years now, gone to extensive lengths to paint Nick as a Fed who's not to be trusted.
▪️Nick has likewise responded and extensively exposed the evidence that Tucker is the Fed who's not to be trusted.
These are damning allegations from extremely accomplished and talented broadcasters with high attributed credibility. Here are your options:
1. They're both Feds secretly running a collaborative scam on all of us, and therefore neither can be trusted.
2. Tucker is right: Nick is running a Fed op & shouldn't be trusted.
3. Nick is right: Tucker is running a Fed op & shouldn't be trusted.
4. Neither are Feds, the extensive allegations from both sides are lies & delusions, and therefore neither's credibility can be trusted.
So you're left with not trusting either them, or trusting one over the other—but not both. Trusting both of them isn't an option. They themselves have removed that option from the table.
This following are all copes at best, and deliberate obfuscations at worst:
-"I like them both."
-"They're both doing good work."
-"I wish they'd get along."
-"It's just a disagreement."
Tucker and Nick are the top of the pile. One is right, the other is wrong. One must be driven out. You don't get to keep both. IMO, those who try to maintain the illusion that both are on our side are either not being intellectually honest, or are serving a separate agenda themselves.
Tell me who you've got and why.
There's an emerging narrative on the Dissident Right: that the conflict between @NickJFuentes & Tucker Carlson is just some kind of disagreement—as if they're arguing tax policy or something. Nothing could be further from the truth. You can't trust BOTH of them. Let me explain why:
▪️Tucker has repeatedly, over the course of years now, gone to extensive lengths to paint Nick as a Fed who's not to be trusted.
▪️Nick has likewise responded and extensively exposed the evidence that Tucker is the Fed who's not to be trusted.
These are damning allegations from extremely accomplished and talented broadcasters with high attributed credibility. Here are your options:
1. They're both Feds secretly running a collaborative scam on all of us, and therefore neither can be trusted.
2. Tucker is right: Nick is running a Fed op & shouldn't be trusted.
3. Nick is right: Tucker is running a Fed op & shouldn't be trusted.
4. Neither are Feds, the extensive allegations from both sides are lies & delusions, and therefore neither's credibility can be trusted.
So you're left with not trusting either them, or trusting one over the other—but not both. Trusting both of them isn't an option. They themselves have removed that option from the table.
This following are all copes at best, and deliberate obfuscations at worst:
-"I like them both."
-"They're both doing good work."
-"I wish they'd get along."
-"It's just a disagreement."
Tucker and Nick are the top of the pile. One is right, the other is wrong. One must be driven out. You don't get to keep both. IMO, those who try to maintain the illusion that both are on our side are either not being intellectually honest, or are serving a separate agenda themselves.
Tell me who you've got and why.
2
2/ More:
Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯@BasedSamParker
The reason why the conflict between @NickJFuentes & @TuckerCarlson can't be reduced to "a simple disagreement between people on the same side" is because of the nature of the specific allegation: that one of them is running a subversive Fed psyop and isn't who he purports to be. If one of them is a Fed, as alleged, then he is by definition NOT ON OUR SIDE.
This is not a disagreement over opinions, ideology or strategic approaches. This about a guy who's secretly playing for a different team while pretending to be on our team. A literal imposter. That's the problem. And given their respective status, prominence and platforms, it's not something to be taken lightly or dismissed out of hand.
This is not a disagreement over opinions, ideology or strategic approaches. This about a guy who's secretly playing for a different team while pretending to be on our team. A literal imposter. That's the problem. And given their respective status, prominence and platforms, it's not something to be taken lightly or dismissed out of hand.