48 hours ago OpenAI dropped GPT-5 and the internet went wild. I...
Robert Youssef@rryssf
92 views
Aug 09, 2025
~2 min read
Advertisement
1
48 hours ago OpenAI dropped GPT-5 and the internet went wild.
I wanted to know if it was hype or real.
So I tested it against Claude Opus, Gemini 2.5, and other top-tier AIs on real work:
• Automation
• Writing
• Building apps
• Research
The results shocked me.
Here are 7 ways I’m now using it for automation, writing, building apps, and more:
I wanted to know if it was hype or real.
So I tested it against Claude Opus, Gemini 2.5, and other top-tier AIs on real work:
• Automation
• Writing
• Building apps
• Research
The results shocked me.
Here are 7 ways I’m now using it for automation, writing, building apps, and more:
2
1. Write a viral X thread from scratch
Why GPT-5 wins: It didn’t just follow my outline it created a scroll-stopping hook, structured the thread into cliffhanger tweets, and suggested a meme. The whole thing felt like I had a top ghostwriter in my pocket.
Other LLMs: Claude 4 Sonnet was poetic and concise, great for polished prose. Gemini 2.5 had fast turnaround and strong fact-checking.
Why GPT-5 wins: It didn’t just follow my outline it created a scroll-stopping hook, structured the thread into cliffhanger tweets, and suggested a meme. The whole thing felt like I had a top ghostwriter in my pocket.
Other LLMs: Claude 4 Sonnet was poetic and concise, great for polished prose. Gemini 2.5 had fast turnaround and strong fact-checking.
0:24
3
2. Build a full marketing campaign in 5 minutes
Why GPT-5 wins: It created the campaign strategy, ad copy, landing page outline, and even a 30-day content calendar all consistent with brand tone.
Other LLMs: Gemini 2.5’s strength was in data-driven targeting ideas. Grok 4 had bold, edgy creative angles.
Why GPT-5 wins: It created the campaign strategy, ad copy, landing page outline, and even a 30-day content calendar all consistent with brand tone.
Other LLMs: Gemini 2.5’s strength was in data-driven targeting ideas. Grok 4 had bold, edgy creative angles.
3:00
4
3. Create a working “bouncing ball” web app
Why GPT-5 wins: It instantly wrote runnable HTML + JavaScript code for a smooth canvas animation, then optimized frame rendering for performance.
Other LLMs: Claude 4 Opus wrote clean, well-documented code. Gemini 2.5 caught a couple of potential edge cases.
Play it.. its so fun:
chatgpt.com/canvas/shared/…
Why GPT-5 wins: It instantly wrote runnable HTML + JavaScript code for a smooth canvas animation, then optimized frame rendering for performance.
Other LLMs: Claude 4 Opus wrote clean, well-documented code. Gemini 2.5 caught a couple of potential edge cases.
Play it.. its so fun:
chatgpt.com/canvas/shared/…
1:08
5
4. Build a playable browser game
Why GPT-5 wins: It produced a functional productivity-style clicker game in one go, with a polished UI and no missing dependencies.
Other LLMs: Grok 4 was fun and experimental, throwing in quirky game mechanics. Claude Sonnet provided exceptionally readable code for future edits.
Why GPT-5 wins: It produced a functional productivity-style clicker game in one go, with a polished UI and no missing dependencies.
Other LLMs: Grok 4 was fun and experimental, throwing in quirky game mechanics. Claude Sonnet provided exceptionally readable code for future edits.
0:51
6
5. Automate my content repurposing
Why GPT-5 wins: I dropped in a YouTube transcript, and it gave me 3 LinkedIn posts, 2 X threads, and a short-form video script — all ready to post.
Other LLMs: Gemini 2.5 was precise in summarizing key timestamps. Claude 4 was great at long-form blog repurposing.
Why GPT-5 wins: I dropped in a YouTube transcript, and it gave me 3 LinkedIn posts, 2 X threads, and a short-form video script — all ready to post.
Other LLMs: Gemini 2.5 was precise in summarizing key timestamps. Claude 4 was great at long-form blog repurposing.
0:49
7
6. Generate a full SaaS landing page with copy + code
Why GPT-5 wins: It wrote high-converting copy and delivered responsive HTML/CSS ready to deploy.
Other LLMs: Grok 4 had clever copy hooks. Claude Opus wrote beautifully semantic HTML.
Why GPT-5 wins: It wrote high-converting copy and delivered responsive HTML/CSS ready to deploy.
Other LLMs: Grok 4 had clever copy hooks. Claude Opus wrote beautifully semantic HTML.
0:18
8
7. Manage my personal productivity system
Why GPT-5 wins: It integrated with my task manager API, reorganized my week, and even suggested focus blocks for deep work.
Other LLMs: Gemini 2.5 was great at calendar syncing. Claude 4 was strong at natural-language task breakdowns.
Why GPT-5 wins: It integrated with my task manager API, reorganized my week, and even suggested focus blocks for deep work.
Other LLMs: Gemini 2.5 was great at calendar syncing. Claude 4 was strong at natural-language task breakdowns.
1:11
9
The AI prompt library your competitors don't want you to find
→ Unlimited prompts: $15/month
→ Starter pack: $3.99/month
→ Pro bundle: $9.99/month
Grab it before it's gone 👇
godofprompt.ai/pricing
→ Unlimited prompts: $15/month
→ Starter pack: $3.99/month
→ Pro bundle: $9.99/month
Grab it before it's gone 👇
godofprompt.ai/pricing
10
I hope you've found this thread helpful.
Follow me @rryssf for more.
Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Follow me @rryssf for more.
Like/Repost the quote below if you can: