Claude with CodeRabbit + TaskMaster is crazy good. Now you can Plan...

Now you can Plan with AI, Code with AI, Review with AI.
Here’s the full workflow I use to build MVPs fast and stress-free ↓
This is the exact system I follow:
• Plan clearly (PRD) with @ChatGPT
• Break it down using TaskMaster
• Execute one task at a time using Claude Code inside Cursor
• Review everything with @coderabbitai
Let’s go deeper ↓
I’d give a vague prompt like “build a landing page”
Claude would generate something, but it’d be a mess:
• Half-baked logic
• Features I never asked for
• Debugging spiral
Fast output. Slow progress.
If you give high-level goals, the agent starts guessing.
It invents structure. Makes assumptions.
Result?
Bloated, inconsistent, unscalable code.
You’re not shipping. You’re cleaning up.
I started directing like an engineer.
Not “can you build this?”
But:
“Here’s what to build. Here’s how. Let’s go.”
I became the architect. Claude became the dev.
I follow this loop every time:
1.Plan → Write a clean 1-page PRD
2.Break → Use TaskMaster to map exact tasks
3.Execute → Feed ONE task at a time to Claude inside Cursor
4.Review → Open PR, let CodeRabbit catch bugs
Simple. Repeatable. Fast.
Don’t open Cursor yet.
Start with a simple doc that explains:
• What you’re building
• Why it matters
• Key features + edge cases
You can use ChatGPT or Claude to draft it fast.
This is where the magic happens.
→ Paste the PRD into TaskMaster
→ Let it break features into tasks
→ Check complexity scores
→ Expand anything above 6/10 into smaller subtasks
Repeat till everything is simple.
Don’t dump 10 prompts at once.
→ Pick one task
→ Run it with Claude
→ Read the output
→ Clean it if needed
Only then move to the next.
AI builds better when it’s not rushed.
Start with an internal review using CodeRabbit’s “Fix with AI” feature.
It’ll help you clean up the code and catch obvious issues before moving forward.
Once you’re done with that, push the code and open a PR for a formal review.
CodeRabbit will then:
• Catch hidden bugs
• Suggest better logic
• Improve readability
• Flag missing edge cases
It’s like having a senior developer review every pull request—instantly.
Before:
• Vague prompts
• Junk output
• Hours of rework
• Stress
After:
• Clear tasks
• Clean code
• AI + human clarity
• Faster builds
Claude Code → The executor
TaskMaster → The planner
CodeRabbit → The reviewer
If you’re building MVPs with AI, try this flow.
I’ve never shipped this fast or this clean.
Follow @PrajwalTomar_ for more
Questions? Drop them below, happy to help :)
Like or repost the quote tweet if it was useful:

Now you can Plan with AI, Code with AI, Review with AI.
Here’s the full workflow I use to build MVPs fast and stress-free ↓
And all the other AI dev workflows I’ve shared this week.
So I started a weekly newsletter
Quick recap every Sunday on AI dev, vibe coding, and MVP building.
Subscribe here:
aimvpweekly.beehiiv.com
300+ of us are building AI MVPs together.
If you’re into this, check it out:
🔗 skool.com/ai-mvp-builders