🚨 BREAKING: You're using Claude and NotebookLM the wrong way. Don't...

“Analyze all the sources in this notebook and create a structured research brief on [TOPIC]. Extract the key facts, findings, statistics, expert viewpoints, and important evidence. Cite each point to its source and clearly separate facts from interpretation.”
“Review these sources and identify the 10 most important insights. Prioritize surprising findings, recurring patterns, contradictions, and information that could change how someone understands [TOPIC]. Explain the evidence behind each insight.”
“Compare the sources and identify unanswered questions, conflicting evidence, limitations, and potential research gaps. Only identify gaps that are supported by the available sources.”
“You are given a research brief created from primary sources. Analyze it critically. Identify the strongest insights, weak assumptions, contradictions, and missing information. Do not invent facts or sources.”
“Act as a strategic thinking partner. Based on this research, generate multiple explanations, perspectives, hypotheses, and possible implications. Challenge the obvious conclusion and explain what could be wrong with each interpretation.”
“Turn these research insights into [5 social posts / a YouTube script / an article / a presentation]. Keep every factual claim supported by the research. Make the content clear, engaging, and useful for [AUDIENCE].”
“Audit this final draft against the original research. Identify unsupported claims, inaccurate interpretations, missing context, and statements that need stronger evidence. Then rewrite the draft while preserving the original meaning and clearly flagging anything that still needs verification.”
