#BREAKING Calcutta High Court hearing a plea challenging the WB...

Sr Adv Kalyan Bandopadhyay: They have removed loudspeaker used for Azaan from 4000 mosques. No written order will be served, but police implement it. This is settled law that loudspeakers are allowed within the decibel limit.
#CalcuttaHighCourt
Court: what have they done?
Bandopadhyay: the police have gone and removed all loudspeakers from mosques
#CalcuttaHighCourt
Bandopadhyay: this is the statement of the chief minister. He speaks in the assembly but never issues any order.
Bandopadhyay: to allow us to use the loudspeaker
Court: did you make such prayer to the authority?
Bandopadhyay: how? For 4000 mosques how can I do it?
Court: the details of all these are not here
Court: we are asking which are these 4000 mosques?
Bandopadhyay: they are all over West Bengal
Bandopadhyay: loudspeakers are removed
Court: before 6am you couldn’t use anyway. So I want to know that do you need to use loudspeaker to perform Azan? Why you are required to use that have you stated ?
Here police is judging the entire case and not allowing any use of loudspeakers.
Court: this are your allegations for entire West Bengal.
Bandopadhyay: they have to respond. Let them say they have not removed.
Bandopadhyay: yes
Court: if we pass this order, when it comes to us in contempt, how will we implement that order ? There must be specific instances
Bandopadhyay: then restrict it to the Hooghly district
Interim order, please tell us. They will ask for time to file an affidavit
Bandopadhyay: will court not pass an interim order because many contempt petitions can come?
I am only asking for the HC order to be implemented
Otherwise I shall submit that this petition shall be dismissed with exemplary cost.
Kindly see the pleadings.
Court: what is your stand on the allegations?
AG: it was served yesterday. Can the court proceed on the basis of allegations? Not a single name is mentioned
Where have they said about the removal of loudspeakers by police? There is no whisper that police has removed anything
Which mosque? They say 4000 mosques. Not a single detail
Court: are you saying police has not gone there?
AG: I have to take instructions
AG: you are proceeding on the basis that direction was given.
Court: no no. What is the substance in this fact? You are saying no police had gone there
AG: the petition doesn’t say
Court: we understand. But we want to examine as the HC has passed a slew of orders. Now they allege the police is threatening. How do you respond to that ? Are you saying it is absolutely false?
AG: kindly keep it on Tuesday, I can take instructions
AG: I have called a meeting. That is the allegation, again without particulars. Today when someone calls someone we know who is calling
Bandopadhyay: if he has finished I will point out. We are not in a trial on suit.
Court: this is a fact that there is no averments in the writ petition that police has entered the mosque
Kindly see we have written that police officers have been visiting the mosque and have insisted that the loudspeakers be removed. They have not by hand removed it but have given pressure for them to be removed
Hearing ends
