BREAKING: Remember the UN report that bizarrely accused Israel of...
Max 📟@MaxNordau
20 views
Oct 12, 2026
~3 min read
Advertisement
1
BREAKING: Remember the UN report that bizarrely accused Israel of genocide?
The UN commissioner who signed it debates @BrianCox_RLTW to defend the report, and he couldn't even explain the "genocidal acts" that he alleged.
Chris Sidoti signed the UN commission’s report accusing Israel of genocide. One of its genocidal acts: the destruction of Gaza’s largest IVF clinic.
His commission told the UN General Assembly the clinic was hit by “air strikes.” Six months later, it told the Human Rights Council it was “most probably a shell fired from an ISF tank.” Neither report mentions the change. They don't even know what happened, and they're using it as evidence.
0:32 “I’ve not looked at this now for two years”
0:54 “It was a tank shell”
1:07 “I’m stumbling, and I know that I shouldn’t be stumbling”
2:51 Asked about the airstrike version: “I have no recollection”
The commission’s own witness testified there was “no evidence of an airstrike,” and that 2,000 specimens were lost before the attack, when the clinic ran short of liquid nitrogen. The next day, the commission called it genocide, with genocidal intent “the only inference that could reasonably be drawn.”
Full debate: youtu.be/C-ZFiVIFdyU
🧵
The UN commissioner who signed it debates @BrianCox_RLTW to defend the report, and he couldn't even explain the "genocidal acts" that he alleged.
Chris Sidoti signed the UN commission’s report accusing Israel of genocide. One of its genocidal acts: the destruction of Gaza’s largest IVF clinic.
His commission told the UN General Assembly the clinic was hit by “air strikes.” Six months later, it told the Human Rights Council it was “most probably a shell fired from an ISF tank.” Neither report mentions the change. They don't even know what happened, and they're using it as evidence.
0:32 “I’ve not looked at this now for two years”
0:54 “It was a tank shell”
1:07 “I’m stumbling, and I know that I shouldn’t be stumbling”
2:51 Asked about the airstrike version: “I have no recollection”
The commission’s own witness testified there was “no evidence of an airstrike,” and that 2,000 specimens were lost before the attack, when the clinic ran short of liquid nitrogen. The next day, the commission called it genocide, with genocidal intent “the only inference that could reasonably be drawn.”
Full debate: youtu.be/C-ZFiVIFdyU
🧵
5:14
2
Chris Sidoti—a UN commissioner who co-authored the report that bizarrely accused Israel of genocide—explains that proving genocidal intent takes “a very, very high test,” one “higher than the criminal standard of beyond reasonable doubt.”
But then, later, he contradicts himself. Explaining the standard his commission actually uses: “It’s not a high standard.” The UN’s own definition of it: “gobbledygook.”
Asked to apply beyond reasonable doubt: “No...We are not a court.”
His commission found genocidal intent “on reasonable grounds,” the standard he calls “not a high standard.”
The reality is that there is no standard.
But then, later, he contradicts himself. Explaining the standard his commission actually uses: “It’s not a high standard.” The UN’s own definition of it: “gobbledygook.”
Asked to apply beyond reasonable doubt: “No...We are not a court.”
His commission found genocidal intent “on reasonable grounds,” the standard he calls “not a high standard.”
The reality is that there is no standard.
3:55
3
Chris Sidoti's UN report—which bizarrely accuses Israel of committing genocide—claims that the ICJ “put all States on notice of the plausibility of the State of Israel committing genocide.”
Then, @BrianCox_RLTW plays a clip from former ICJ President Joan Donoghue, explaining that this is not what the court ruled: Contrary to "what's often said in the media," the ICJ “didn’t decide that the claim of genocide was plausible.”
Sidoti falsely asserts: “Our paragraph is entirely consistent with then-President Donoghue’s comments.”
Then, @BrianCox_RLTW plays a clip from former ICJ President Joan Donoghue, explaining that this is not what the court ruled: Contrary to "what's often said in the media," the ICJ “didn’t decide that the claim of genocide was plausible.”
Sidoti falsely asserts: “Our paragraph is entirely consistent with then-President Donoghue’s comments.”
3:17
4
Chris Sidoti—a UN human rights commissioner who co-authored a report bizarrely accusing Israel of genocide—claims: “We do not rely on media reports.”
He is then confronted with a section of his report that insanely asserted that 83 percent of those killed in Gaza were civilians. The report takes this as evidence that Israel "deliberately targeted Palestinian civilians."
But this claim rests entirely on one Guardian article, which took an IDF database of 8,900 militants listed as dead or “probably” dead, subtracted it from the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry’s 53,000 deaths, and called everyone else a civilian.
Did the commission check any of this? “No, we didn’t...we literally do not know.”
He is then confronted with a section of his report that insanely asserted that 83 percent of those killed in Gaza were civilians. The report takes this as evidence that Israel "deliberately targeted Palestinian civilians."
But this claim rests entirely on one Guardian article, which took an IDF database of 8,900 militants listed as dead or “probably” dead, subtracted it from the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry’s 53,000 deaths, and called everyone else a civilian.
Did the commission check any of this? “No, we didn’t...we literally do not know.”
1:36
5
The moderator points out that no commissioner, past or present, has military experience—which would be very important for determining the lawful use of force in wartime!
Chris Sidoti claims his UN commission—which bizarrely accused Israel of committing genocide—has a full-time military expert on staff. Asked who: “We do not give out the names.”
His source: Trust me.
@BrianCox_RLTW, 22 years in the US Army, seven as a military lawyer, points out how indefensible this is: “I have no idea what type of experience they have, what type of biases they have...You know who I am.”
“They will not ask me to be a military expert.”
Chris Sidoti claims his UN commission—which bizarrely accused Israel of committing genocide—has a full-time military expert on staff. Asked who: “We do not give out the names.”
His source: Trust me.
@BrianCox_RLTW, 22 years in the US Army, seven as a military lawyer, points out how indefensible this is: “I have no idea what type of experience they have, what type of biases they have...You know who I am.”
“They will not ask me to be a military expert.”
4:51
6
Chris Sidoti—co-author of a UN report that bizarrely accused Israel of genocide—“corrects” Cox: “Human Rights Watch has not made any comment about whether Gaza constitutes genocide or not...They haven’t done it.”
Turns out, they did: In December 2024, Human Rights Watch released a report titled “Extermination and Acts of Genocide.”
This is the man weighing the evidence for genocide, continuously getting details wrong.
Turns out, they did: In December 2024, Human Rights Watch released a report titled “Extermination and Acts of Genocide.”
This is the man weighing the evidence for genocide, continuously getting details wrong.
1:21