A few patterns we frequently use with Fable 5: Use Fable 5 as an...

ClaudeDevs@ClaudeDevs
12 views
Jul 08, 2026
Advertisement
2
On SWE-bench Pro, Sonnet 5 + a Fable 5 advisor tool gets ~92% of Fable 5's score at ~63% of the price.
Fable 5 is called rarely (~once) per task to steer while Sonnet 5 executors the majority of the work.
See our docs to learn more:
platform.claude.com/docs/en/agents…
Fable 5 is called rarely (~once) per task to steer while Sonnet 5 executors the majority of the work.
See our docs to learn more:
platform.claude.com/docs/en/agents…
4
On BrowseComp, we tested Claude Managed Agents w/ Fable 5 orchestrator + Sonnet 5 worker sub-agents.
The Fable 5 orchestrator achieves 96% of Fable 5 performance at 46% of the price.
Token-heavy research is delegated to Sonnet 5.
See our cookbook:
github.com/anthropics/cla…
The Fable 5 orchestrator achieves 96% of Fable 5 performance at 46% of the price.
Token-heavy research is delegated to Sonnet 5.
See our cookbook:
github.com/anthropics/cla…
5
Claude Managed Agents supports both patterns with sub-agents.
Escalate up to a Fable 5 advisor, or delegate down to Sonnet 5 workers.
Each sub-agent keeps its own cache, so repeat calls don't pay in full for the same context twice.
platform.claude.com/docs/en/manage…
Escalate up to a Fable 5 advisor, or delegate down to Sonnet 5 workers.
Each sub-agent keeps its own cache, so repeat calls don't pay in full for the same context twice.
platform.claude.com/docs/en/manage…



