@MarioNawfal ↔ @DietHeartNews conversation
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal
144 views
Jan 01, 2026
~2 min read
Advertisement
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal
🇺🇸🇺🇦 WHILE THE PENTAGON PAUSED UKRAINE, THE CIA RAN THE WAR
Publicly, Washington hesitated. Quietly, Langley went to work.
According to a New York Times investigation, U.S. military aid to Ukraine froze in March 2025 after Trump ordered a halt. Weapons stalled. Intelligence sharing slowed. The Pentagon pulled back.
The CIA didn’t.
Granted a carve-out, the agency warned the White House that a full cutoff would endanger American officers already inside Ukraine. Exemption approved. Operations continued. Then they escalated - covertly.
With ATACMS strikes off the table, the CIA pivoted to Ukrainian-built drones, supplying targeting intelligence for hits on Russia’s war economy: oil refineries, explosive-chemical plants, and Moscow’s shadow oil fleet.
Not symbolic strikes - precision hits on components that can’t be easily replaced.
Early attempts fizzled. Russian jamming ate drones alive. So in June, CIA and U.S. officers redesigned the campaign. Fewer targets. Smarter ones. Result: refineries offline for weeks and up to $75 million a day in estimated losses. Gas lines followed.
No U.S. weapons shipped. No public fingerprints. Just intelligence, math, and deniability.
Trump reportedly liked it. Pressure without headlines. Pain without escalation.
What does this mean?
America didn’t abandon Ukraine - it split the war in two. The Pentagon paused. The CIA improvised. And while Congress argued, Langley found something that works.
This is how modern wars are sustained now: quietly, bureaucratically, and just plausible enough to deny.
Source: The New York Times, U.S. intelligence officials, @clashreport
Publicly, Washington hesitated. Quietly, Langley went to work.
According to a New York Times investigation, U.S. military aid to Ukraine froze in March 2025 after Trump ordered a halt. Weapons stalled. Intelligence sharing slowed. The Pentagon pulled back.
The CIA didn’t.
Granted a carve-out, the agency warned the White House that a full cutoff would endanger American officers already inside Ukraine. Exemption approved. Operations continued. Then they escalated - covertly.
With ATACMS strikes off the table, the CIA pivoted to Ukrainian-built drones, supplying targeting intelligence for hits on Russia’s war economy: oil refineries, explosive-chemical plants, and Moscow’s shadow oil fleet.
Not symbolic strikes - precision hits on components that can’t be easily replaced.
Early attempts fizzled. Russian jamming ate drones alive. So in June, CIA and U.S. officers redesigned the campaign. Fewer targets. Smarter ones. Result: refineries offline for weeks and up to $75 million a day in estimated losses. Gas lines followed.
No U.S. weapons shipped. No public fingerprints. Just intelligence, math, and deniability.
Trump reportedly liked it. Pressure without headlines. Pain without escalation.
What does this mean?
America didn’t abandon Ukraine - it split the war in two. The Pentagon paused. The CIA improvised. And while Congress argued, Langley found something that works.
This is how modern wars are sustained now: quietly, bureaucratically, and just plausible enough to deny.
Source: The New York Times, U.S. intelligence officials, @clashreport
Alan Watson@DietHeartNews
According to Ukrainian army database, 1.6 million Ukrainian soldiers have been KIA, MIA or were wounded, permanently disabled. According to Baltic-based Mediazona, no friend of Putin’s, Russian KIA is 156,161. Russian losses have been exaggerated, while Ukraine’s losses hidden.
Meanwhile, on the ground, 2025 marked consistent Russian advances. The recent liberation of Seversk, as well as earlier successful operations in Pokrovsk and other key Donetsk cities, illustrates a deliberate strategy of gradual Russian advance, prioritizing the attrition of enemy capabilities over large-scale offensives that put Russian soldiers at risk.
Meanwhile, on the ground, 2025 marked consistent Russian advances. The recent liberation of Seversk, as well as earlier successful operations in Pokrovsk and other key Donetsk cities, illustrates a deliberate strategy of gradual Russian advance, prioritizing the attrition of enemy capabilities over large-scale offensives that put Russian soldiers at risk.
