Every time that someone spews some tripe about “eugenic female mate selection,” keep in mind that women were not the mate selectors at any point in human history, and since that changed the population has become less eugenic.
Also this is why I’m against any fertility tech that would allow a man to create a child absent a woman.
If you can’t convince a woman to have a child with you, you are not supposed to pass your genes on. Its dysgenic.
2
Modern “dating” is just a form of prostitution that has been complicated for the sake of making women feel good. If artificial wombs existed and no other changes occurred, 99.99% of men would never marry again. They would pay a nanny to raise their child.
3
If artificial wombs are created, robot girlfriends aren’t far behind. After that, only the most religious of men will ever have any excuse to interact with a “woman” ever again. They would be completely relegated to second-class citizens.
4
The real reason that feminists are opposed to these kinds of things has nothing to do with “dysgenics,” which they don’t believe in anyways – it’s because they know that the retarded gynocracy of the modern day immediately ceases to exist if men have other options.
5
Just go back to not being fat, annoying, henpecking, retarded sows – now is your last opportunity. If reproduction is somehow separated from “females” and attached to robots, there’s genuinely no off-ramp.
6
I’m serious. If robots can create some approximation of female companionship — leave alone mimicking anime girls — and take care of reproduction, 99.99% of men will never touch or look at you again. Men would just gene-engineer for male offspring. Women may literally go extinct.
7
I’m telling you this for your own good – out of the kindness of my heart. You have one last chance to do the right thing.
Save this thread — create a free accountSave this thread