It’s funny how the British White Nationalists expect their King to be on their side against the immigrants— he reads Guenon, he’s said “based” things before, he’s a self defined “Traditonalist”— but be comes out against them— why? Because racism is a product of liberal modernity. He is a Royalist, all of his serfs are his subjects.
2
“Political Racism,” historically, is simply a form of utopian socialism— thoroughly bourgeois / petty bourgeois ideology— before the French Revolution, to suggest all French Men were equal would be politically egregious. “Tradition” is feudalism— not bourgeois liberal national capitalism— “racial nationalism” is just a type of ultraleftism, actually, & is closer to anarchism & other forms of utopian socialism than it is to Royalism.
3
I actually tend to agree with the assessment of Nazism as “leftist”— it is just Social Democracy at war— you see Nazism emerge as socially acceptable when Social Democracies have to go to war, like in Ukraine.
4
The landed nobility were generally more in favor of being liberated by the British than having Hitler, but preferred Hitler to Stalin.
5
“In the 1930s, the noble German families made up 0.15% of the population. They did however make up about half of the participants in the two plots against Hilter, 1938 and 1944. Particularly East-Elbian and Catholic aristocrats.”
Save this thread — create a free accountSave this thread