Heretics like these think we have to keep removing every Hadith the...

Heretics like these think we have to keep removing every Hadith the Kuffar dislike and then eventually let us also remove every verse of the Quran they "(mis)use" until you're left with nothing but a goyslop book meant for goysheep like you.

What these people don't understand is that this is not some novel idea. The 2 Shaykhs — Imam Bukhari & Muslim already did most of the heavy lifting. Except a few (less than 1%) weak hadiths in their collections — their reliability is attested & agreed upon by the Ummah.

In fact, the 2 Sahihs became the standard so much so that people like Ibn Abd Al Barr in his book At-Tamhid would say that if neither Bukhari nor Muslim included a Hadith in their Sahihs then it must mean that particular Hadith must have some weakness.

This doesn't mean that there aren't any authentic Hadiths outside the 2 Sahihs. It means that if you come across a Hadith which wasn't included by the 2 Shaykhs, this is your first flag to inspect that Hadith thoroughly or consult with subject matter experts.

And when it comes to Hadiths about rulings i.e. matters of Halal & Haram, then Bukhari & Muslim was believed to have all of them. Al-Shafi'i believed Malik's Muwatta had all of them except a few and we know the 2 Sahihs already include all these hadiths from Muwatta & more.

I will do a different thread another day that shows how much work has been done by the past scholars and why this "we need a new Hadith book" is a retarded statement and shows the one saying it is a clueless fool that has no idea that many already tried to produce such books.