Many LLM-based optimization algorithms have been proposed recently....

How do we leverage the complementary performance profiles of these optimization algorithms?
Today, we release optimize_anything omni: a meta-optimizer that leverages the best of each optimizer. At a matched budget, omni beats every standalone optimizer. (thread)
We formalized this in our optimize_anything release (demonstrated over code optimization, graphics design, algorithm and mathematical optimization, etc.), and have since seen the application of GEPA, AutoResearch, and Meta-Harness to many interesting problems.
optimize_anything’s goal is to allow users to express their problem once, and benefit from continued research into optimizers.

It consistently matches or outperforms domain-specific tools optimizing code, prompts, agent harnesses, cloud policies, even visuals!
If you can measure it, you can optimize it.
Under the same model, thinking effort, and budget, no optimizer is dominating all the randomly selected tasks. Out of 10 tasks, GEPA dominates 3, AutoResearch dominates 3, and Meta-Harness dominates 4.
This motivated the question: How do we leverage the complementary performance profiles of these optimization algorithms?
Read more: gepa-ai.github.io/gepa/blog/2026…
Special thanks to @rishabhs @qiuyupeng @Mdjxjxnsk @lateinteraction for discussion and feedback on this work. We are grateful to the GEPA open-source community, too.





