"At a time when the American public is expressing unprecedented...

Put plainly, the U.S. military’s data could soon be the Israeli military’s data.
That is not normal defense cooperation. That is something much deeper.
Israel has received more than $200 billion in inflation-adjusted U.S. military assistance since 1948.
But Section 224 would mark a shift from aid to integration.
Traditional military aid is at least somewhat visible and politically accountable.
But moving the relationship into defense acquisition, co-production, and joint tech development risks pushing it further into the shadows.
If Israeli defense firms expand co-production facilities here, they can claim to create jobs in congressional districts — and gain more allies in Congress.
That’s how military-industrial influence grows.
Section 224 could turbocharge that model — making the Israeli military-industrial base even more embedded in U.S. politics.
A recent poll found just 16% of Americans support continuing to supply Israel with weapons without new restrictions.
The public is asking for more restraint and accountability with Israel.
Congress is proposing deeper, less transparent military integration.
That’s not democracy. That’s the military-industrial complex doing what it does best.
Israel has repeatedly used U.S. weapons in Gaza in ways that human rights groups and journalists have linked to violations of international humanitarian law.
This is not the moment to deepen integration with Israel’s military.
The first step is simple:
Reject Section 224 from the NDAA.
Stop the U.S.-Israel military-industrial merger before it starts.
