April 26, 1991. Today marks the 35th anniversary of the Andover,...

This thread looks at the meteorological data and the historical impact of that day. 🧵👇 #Andover #KSwx
Video credit: USAF McConnell AFBov
Experts now warn that overpasses are wind tunnels that increase the risk of being struck by debris or blown out from the girders. Never seek shelter under a bridge. Warning ⚠️ 🌪️
Location: Wichita, Kansas
Video credit: KSNW-TV Wichita, Kansas
Photojournalist: Ted Lewis
In the field, John Wright (Mobile 7) described a "blue-purple" sky, stating he’d never seen a storm like this.
Location: Butler County, KS
Radio: KFDI-FM (John Wright)
Watch Mike Smith on KSNW-TV as he tracks the violent F5 in real-time. He identifies the massive debris signature on radar and issues a direct, desperate warning: the tornado is moving into Andover and hitting the mobile home park.
Location: Wichita/Andover, KS
Video Credit: KSNW-TV (Mike Smith)
The Setup: At 1300 UTC, a low pressure system was in SW Nebraska with a dry line extending into West Texas.
Dew points in the 60s covered Kansas, while air behind the line dropped into the 20s. A warm front stretched SE from the low through Kansas.
The Key: The dry line slowed in the afternoon because winds behind it backed to the south/ southwest instead of staying westerly. This stalled the boundary and kept the moisture locked in place for the Andover F5.
Data: NOAA/NWS Disaster Survey Report
These figures from the NWS report detail the specific environmental conditions at 0000 UTC during the peak of the outbreak.
• Instability (Fig. 10): The Topeka (TOP) sounding recorded CAPE values > 4,000 J/kg. The report identifies this as an extremely unstable environment.
• The Inversion: A significant capping inversion was noted at the 800 mb level.
The NWS states this "cap" inhibited early convection, allowing for greater energy accumulation.
• Kinematics (Fig. 11): The Topeka hodograph showed strong clockwise curvature. The calculated Storm-Relative Helicity (SRH) was 388 m^2/s^2, well above the threshold for violent tornadoes.
• The Dryline: Surface analysis showed a sharp moisture gradient, with dewpoints crashing from 65°F to 30°F across the boundary.
NWS Conclusion:
The report concludes that the combination of 4,000+ CAPE and 388 SRH provided the scientific evidence that a "major, violent outbreak was clearly evident" through the available sounding and hodograph data.
Data: NOAA / NWS Natural Disaster Survey Report
Figures 17a-f. Infrared imagery: Show the approach of the jet streak and the rapid generation of the convection.
Figures 18a-f. One kilometer resolution visible satellite imagery: Show the explosive development of the convection across Oklahoma and Kansas.
The Dry Punch (Figure 18e): A strong dry intrusion (dissipating clouds) can be noted on the 2330 UTC visible image just west of Andover (located by the +). This dry punch is a distinct satellite signature of severe weather.
WSO Wichita did not have any real-time satellite imagery available.
Data and Imagery: NOAA / NWS Natural
Disaster Survey Report
Figure 20: A color hardcopy of the WSR-88D reflectivity data from Norman, OK, at 2339 UTC, the exact time the tornado struck Andover.
The Comparison:
• WSR-57 (Wichita): The storm was lost in ground clutter. Spotters reported the tornado before the radar could even see it.
• WSR-88D (Norman): Even from a distance, the new Doppler technology detected the storm features before the tornado formed.
The Impact:
The 1991 outbreak was the ultimate proof that the National Weather Service needed to move away from 1950s tech. The WSR-88D provided a level of detail that saved lives by showing storm structures previously invisible to forecasters.
Data and Imagery: NOAA / NWS Natural Disaster Survey Report








