for a while i've had a slight fear that the bluetooth from my...

this weekend i pulled the raw data from a $30m government study of 1,679 mice blasted with cell phone radiation and reanalyzed it
what i found was...not what I expected?
🧵
they were exposed to .9 – 1.9 GHz radiation, 9 hours a day
for context:
- this is the same radiofrequency used in your phone's 2G/3G signal – and is similar to the 2.4 GHz frequency used in bluetooth
- the intensity of radiation is roughly 100x more powerful than that emitted by something like airpods and 10x a cell phone
- decreased inflammation
- less brain cell death (necrosis)
- less kidney disease (nephropathy)
- less mineralization of organs
there was also 5 significant harms, including an increased risk of hemorrhage and a few other things
if this was a pill, i'd be buying
my guess is its a sort of hormesis effect, where a little of a bad thing ends up being good
kind of like exercise: wear and tear on your muscles causes them to grow back bigger and stronger
maybe here, the amount of DNA damage and other harms from the radiation is slight enough that is causes cells to upregulate repairs proteins and such, leading to net good effects
(side note: we know from a companion study that there really was an increase in DNA damage from the radiation PMID: 31633839)
and. lived. longer. and. were. healthier.
full analysis + code: github.com/zanekoch/airpo…
original paper (mice): ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK56452…
original paper (rats): ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK56173…




