The difference in tactics for Manchester United from Darren...

The difference in tactics for Manchester United from Darren Fletcher vs Burnley: Analysis (a thread)

▪️Progressing through bravery and in the middle
▪️3-2-2-3/2-1-4-3
▪️Fletcher's 2nd half change

The intensity, aggression and pace was a stark difference from what we saw from the Amorim era. In the manner in which United were braver on the ball and more inclined to progress through the middle as well of course a change in formaiton 4-2-3-1 that was very dynamic

United were very good at moving Burnley's back five around and finding space in between their centre-backs and full-backs, mainly because they always had one player joining Sesko and a winger to push up against their defence. 1 runner in behind, 1 player to drag a defender out.

The reason why this was dangerous was because playing a 3-2-2, meant that at once United's attackers (even Ugarte or Casemiro) were encouraged to push right up. It's a farcry to previous games where United were heavily reliant on one of two players creating.

In the first half Burnley did a decent job of going 3v3 or making sure that the middle of the pitch was marked off, this changed when Cunha was instructed come deeper (sometimes into his own half) and another attacker pushed up against BUrnley's back line.

It created a box in midfield, committing lots of players in the centre. So when the ball is played wide, Burnley's block has to go to one side opening up the half-space gaps for a number 10 to run into. For the goal it was Cunha first, then Fernandes.

Because one can play as the short option as the inside pass, the other can drag a defender with him. For the risky pass to Fernandes for the goal, there are 5 United attackers pushed up against Burnley's 6 and the PL's best chance creator (Fernandes) is finally advanced.

There were soo many matched under Amorim when United simply looked to go long, whilst they still used this from time to time, it was noticable to see players carry the ball 30/40 yards or dribble past a press and progress the ball into midfield.

Playing a 3-2-2 means Burnley committed 5 players in the press, but past United's pivot, there were two players ahead of them so Burnley's defence had to mark them. Even when it didn't really work 1st half, they STILL tried to pass it riskily.

Though United drew, the change of intent was clear to see. Having two shots cleared off the line, striking the woodwork twice and scoring two goals, they really should've won, of course, they played Burnley, but Amorim struggled to break down so many teams.

The agressiveness, commitment of men and general angle to 'go for it' has to be applauded. It was one game but I would weigh up Fletcher for an interm appointment, he knows the club inside out and if this game is to go off, they'll win enough for the remainder of the season.

End of thread! Substack in bio, let me know your thoughts.