What I learned after building 2 MVPs with Claude Code (and why I...

Here’s what I wish someone told me earlier ↓
Don’t just ask it to “add feature X.”
Start in plan mode.
Let it think first.
Then review the plan and run it.
It’s slower, but the code is way cleaner.
This is where you define your project:
- Goal
- Tech stack
- Folder structure
- App flow
Claude keeps referring to this throughout.
Without it, the context gets lost fast.
Break big tasks into smaller ones.
Give it the exact file/folder.
Tell it what to change.
Ask it to double-check its own work.
It’s surprisingly good at catching its own mistakes.
Claude doesn’t ask “Are you sure?”
It just edits.
So set checkpoints often.
I create a new branch for every task.
If something breaks, I can always roll back.
Got layout issues?
Use screenshots.
Just say:
“Here’s the bug”
“Here’s what I want it to look like”
It usually nails it in one go.
Sometimes I feed it entire folders from past MVPs.
It instantly understands the structure and style I’m aiming for.
Helps a LOT if you’re building something similar.
This one’s underrated.
Right after it writes code, just ask it to review and fix issues.
Feels like code + QA in one step.
If you’re in a rush, it’ll frustrate you.
But if you want high-quality output and fewer hallucinations,
It’s one of the best I’ve used so far.
The more context you give,
The better the results.
Treat it like a real teammate.
Not just a prompt machine.
Claude won’t magically build your app.
But if you learn how to work with it, it’s insanely powerful.
I’m still used to the Cursor workflow as I’ve shipped 18+ MVPs for clients with it.
But I’ve been testing Claude Code lately, and I’ve been loving it.
Stay tuned for a full comparison really soon.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask below. :)
Like/Repost the quote below if you can: