An apt perspective by you. Let's clarify something. The political...

@hellfire_81
𝕳𝖊𝖑𝖑𝖋𝖎𝖗𝖊🇮🇳@hellfire_81
13 views Nov 15, 2025 ~2 min read
Advertisement
1
An apt perspective by you.

Let's clarify something.
The political directives to Armed Forces, in 2019, were to carry out strikes in a way that the adversary could not make the narrative into an India-Pakistan military conflict, hence the restrictions put in form of RoEs at (1/n)
@IndicSight
Indic Sight@IndicSight
@hellfire_81 While military briefing to pol leadership n other state institutions is essential, it is equally important for military leadership to gain insight into the perspectives of other stakeholders. One-way info flow creates silos, which can be detrimental to cohesive national strategy
2
the time, which saw a pure defensive approach by the IAF. The uproar in Indian Defence Space over the same notwithstanding, the approach allowed India to effectively keep the narrative to a pure anti-terror operation & 'restraint' in response to PAF shenanigans & Indian (2/n)
3
actions in ensuring release of own Pilot, kept the whole action strictly in the domain of the anti-terror ops.

The present action is being seen as an act of a rogue military leadership (parts of it or the whole) that continues to use terror as a policy to ensure its own (3/n)
4
survival & maintain the tenuous hold over power in a nation that is struggling to survive. The political directives this time appear to be to address this particular subset in a holistic manner, wherein a combination of sustained diplomatic & military pressure, will be used (4/n)
5
to challenge this subset. A calibrated & sequentially escalatory multimodal pressure, will be put. The game appears to be longer - shaping of common Pakistani's perception of this subset that is out to undermine its interests to ensure own survival at any cost with using (5/n)
6
sustainable measures to degrade the capability of the subset on a permanent basis.

Towards the same, I expect military strikes to be calibrated in order to showcase the inability of this subset of Pakistan to insure its own interests & also designed to undermine their (6/n)
7
compentency in their core field. Let's see how this plays out.

One thing was clear by 8 am yesterday - forces have been told to act in a way that any interference in subsequent anti-terror operations is to be deemed as an interference by terror support structure & not as (7/n)
8
a military engagement.

The proverbial ducks are now being lined up by the GoI.

(8/n)
9
@threadreaderapp unroll please
Actions
What You Can Do
  • Export as PDF or Markdown
  • Batch Export to Notion
  • Bookmark & Highlight
  • Screenshot Tweet
Create Free Account

Includes 7-day Premium trial

Advertisement