🇺🇸The US was founded & built by people filtered through these...
Sam Parker 🇺🇲@SamParkerSenate
55 views
Jan 23, 2025
~4 min read
Advertisement
1
🇺🇸The US was founded & built by people filtered through these criteria & forces:
-White racial genetics
-Christian values/beliefs
-European systems/conventions
-Independent, risk-taking, frontier-minded, pioneer-spirit capability
Although America is White, it is more than that.
-White racial genetics
-Christian values/beliefs
-European systems/conventions
-Independent, risk-taking, frontier-minded, pioneer-spirit capability
Although America is White, it is more than that.
Gentile News Network™@Gentilenewsnet
America is a White country
2
🧵2/ Founding Population & Growth:
Citizens
White Protestants: ~2.45 million
White Catholics: ~47.5k
~2,000 jews
(700k non-citizen slaves)
By 1865, America was ~88% White/10% Black. In 1965, it was 89.5% White, still only around 9-10% Black. 93% Christian.
Citizens
White Protestants: ~2.45 million
White Catholics: ~47.5k
~2,000 jews
(700k non-citizen slaves)
By 1865, America was ~88% White/10% Black. In 1965, it was 89.5% White, still only around 9-10% Black. 93% Christian.
3
🧵3/ In 1965, America was a White European Christian mono-culture. A White Christian ethnostate w/a 1-time special carve-out for Blacks--who were largely also Christian. America was 90/10 bi-racial, but it wasn't multicultural in any significant sense at the national level.
4
🧵4/ America was altered by the 1965 Hart-Celler Immigration & Naturalization Act which opened its borders to non-Whites/non-Christians. In fact, Congress & America were assured that the Act wouldn't alter the ethnic makeup of the country or produce massive immigrant waves. LIES.
5
🧵5/ Until 1965, the US was a stable ethnostate w/a small Black exception. We fought a war, passed an Amendment & decided as a nation to make Blacks citizens. But this didn't transform the fabric of America.
America NEVER chose multiculturalism. It was imposed w/o our will.
America NEVER chose multiculturalism. It was imposed w/o our will.
6
🧵6/ America is NOT a "Nation Of Immigrants."
When the ✡️ ADL paid JFK to write this in 1958 to sell the open borders propaganda, only about 20% of the American population descended from post-1860 "immigrants." This book, like the above statements from his 2 brothers, was a LIE.
When the ✡️ ADL paid JFK to write this in 1958 to sell the open borders propaganda, only about 20% of the American population descended from post-1860 "immigrants." This book, like the above statements from his 2 brothers, was a LIE.
7
🧵7/ If you say everyone who came to America after 1790 was an "immigrant," then only about 30% of the population in 1960 was descended from immigrants.
If you use 1890 as the cutoff (which is when the Census Bureau declared the frontier closed), then it's only 10% immigrant.
If you use 1890 as the cutoff (which is when the Census Bureau declared the frontier closed), then it's only 10% immigrant.
8
🧵8/ American Revolutionary, Founding, & Constitutional principles & thought are profoundly Christian & European.
In 3,154 citations from the political literature of the Era, 34% come directly from the Bible, principally the New Testament. 60% come from various European sources.
In 3,154 citations from the political literature of the Era, 34% come directly from the Bible, principally the New Testament. 60% come from various European sources.
9
🧵9/ LIE: "All we need is the Constitution"
Liberia is descended from former American slaves who spoke English & adopted an identical constitution. It's 85% Christian. It suffered over a century of political strife. In 2019, it was ranked 178 in per capita GDP in the world.
Liberia is descended from former American slaves who spoke English & adopted an identical constitution. It's 85% Christian. It suffered over a century of political strife. In 2019, it was ranked 178 in per capita GDP in the world.
10
🧵10/ "All that matters is if someone is White."
As @NickJFuentes has observed, "'White Nationalism'...is not a sufficient organizing principle."
t.me/nickjfuentes/1…
As @NickJFuentes has observed, "'White Nationalism'...is not a sufficient organizing principle."
t.me/nickjfuentes/1…
11
🧵11/ Portland, Seattle, San Francisco: "Most Godless cities in America," and basically the only places where White people vote Blue & are majority liberal, with Leftist nutjobs aplenty.
White Americans need the moderating influence of Christianity.
White Americans need the moderating influence of Christianity.
12
🧵12/ For millenia, Europe was plagued by interethnic conflict over the 3 Rs:
-Rulership
-Religion
-Resources
America resolved all 3:
-Rulership: The people, in a Republic.
-Which (Christian) religion? 1st Amendment freedom.
-Resources: an entire continent; plenty for everyone.
-Rulership
-Religion
-Resources
America resolved all 3:
-Rulership: The people, in a Republic.
-Which (Christian) religion? 1st Amendment freedom.
-Resources: an entire continent; plenty for everyone.
13
🧵13/ The differences between the different European ethnicities & cultures in America needed time to mix, melt & blend--along with the different flavors of Christianity. Each US State even has its own subculture, forged after 100+ years of unique development.
14
🧵14/ But by 1965, most of the European-origin inter-ethnic/religious quarrels had ended. America was One Nation Under God. It's no coincidence that we were reaching for the stars in the Golden Age of the Space Race--only a generation or 2 removed from the frontier.
15
🧵15/ But that's when it all started crashing down. But not because the crash was inevitable, but because an enemy came and overthrew it. But that will be the topic of another thread. Follow both my accounts so as to not miss it: @SamParkerSenate & @BasedSamParker.
16
🧵16/ Learn how Ronald Reagan helped reprogram American thinking to believe some of these lies about ourselves and our history (2 posts in the 🧵 below):
Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯@BasedSamParker
🧵1/ PRESIDENTS DAY--Ronald Reagan's Greatest Damage To America: "Anyone from any corner of the world can come live here and become an American."
The Reagan administration tripled the national debt, gave immunity to vaccine manufacturers, passed an automatic weapons ban, presided over the Iran-Contra scandal, and gave amnesty to 2.7 million illegals.
But, while all of these things are varying degrees of bad, none of them actually caused irreparable or irreversible harm to the country. And, in hindsight, they kind of pale in comparison to many things that have happened since then.
What was his greatest sin, then? It's actually something far more damaging and insidious than amnesty: it was the attitude and value system he sold subsequent to the amnesty--an attitude and value system that has destroyed our national conscience and self-identity. It transformed how we thought of America, and what it means to be an American. And it's this attitude that has rolled out the red carpet for the fundamental transformation of America.
Listen to him invoke the now-clichéd "Statue of Liberty" vision of immigration. Watch him use the "threat" of global communism as an excuse to open America up as a "place of refuge" for all peoples of the world. Hear him paint a picture of a multicultural America. Watch how he sells the ideas of "freedom" and "liberty" as the fundamental defining aspects and organizing principles of what it means to be an American.
This was Reagan's greatest sin: he convinced Americans that America was just a set of ideas and that anyone from anywhere in the world can come live here and become an American. This was a radical departure from hundreds of years of established American thought about our identity and heritage.
Reagan used his "Great Communicator" skills to sell to America this wholly new vision of America. He transformed--in the hearts of minds of Americans--"what" America is, and "who" Americans even are. And it is this new generic non-identity that has disarmed the ability of Americans to resist the mass waves of immigration into America, the transformation of the American demographic, the destruction of the founding demographic, and the replacement of American workers with foreign labor.
It solidified in the minds of Americans the lie that we are a multicultural, multiracial country--and that we were never anything else. And that to oppose immigration in any way other than whether it's "legal or illegal" is racist, xenophobic, hateful and un-American.
Americans are powerless to stop the destructive transformation of America because they no longer believe in the founding narrative and identity of America. They believe a lie. And now America is becoming that lie.
The Reagan administration tripled the national debt, gave immunity to vaccine manufacturers, passed an automatic weapons ban, presided over the Iran-Contra scandal, and gave amnesty to 2.7 million illegals.
But, while all of these things are varying degrees of bad, none of them actually caused irreparable or irreversible harm to the country. And, in hindsight, they kind of pale in comparison to many things that have happened since then.
What was his greatest sin, then? It's actually something far more damaging and insidious than amnesty: it was the attitude and value system he sold subsequent to the amnesty--an attitude and value system that has destroyed our national conscience and self-identity. It transformed how we thought of America, and what it means to be an American. And it's this attitude that has rolled out the red carpet for the fundamental transformation of America.
Listen to him invoke the now-clichéd "Statue of Liberty" vision of immigration. Watch him use the "threat" of global communism as an excuse to open America up as a "place of refuge" for all peoples of the world. Hear him paint a picture of a multicultural America. Watch how he sells the ideas of "freedom" and "liberty" as the fundamental defining aspects and organizing principles of what it means to be an American.
This was Reagan's greatest sin: he convinced Americans that America was just a set of ideas and that anyone from anywhere in the world can come live here and become an American. This was a radical departure from hundreds of years of established American thought about our identity and heritage.
Reagan used his "Great Communicator" skills to sell to America this wholly new vision of America. He transformed--in the hearts of minds of Americans--"what" America is, and "who" Americans even are. And it is this new generic non-identity that has disarmed the ability of Americans to resist the mass waves of immigration into America, the transformation of the American demographic, the destruction of the founding demographic, and the replacement of American workers with foreign labor.
It solidified in the minds of Americans the lie that we are a multicultural, multiracial country--and that we were never anything else. And that to oppose immigration in any way other than whether it's "legal or illegal" is racist, xenophobic, hateful and un-American.
Americans are powerless to stop the destructive transformation of America because they no longer believe in the founding narrative and identity of America. They believe a lie. And now America is becoming that lie.
17
🧵17/ Debunking & clarifying Reagan's role in fundamentally transforming America:
Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯@BasedSamParker
🇺🇸PRESIDENTS DAY: Did Ronald Reagan's amnesty of 1986/87 ruin California and transform the country from Red to Blue; White to brown?
So goes the conventional wisdom from the Dissident Right. But is it true? Let's take a look:
1⃣ First, the population of the US in 1986 was 240 million, and amnesty was granted to about 2.7 million--or 1.1%--which is roughly the same number of people as came into the country through open borders in one year under Joe Biden & Alejandro Mayorkas.
About 1 million illegals were granted amnesty in California, out of a statewide population of 24.5 million--or about 3.7%. Not nothing, but not a massive leap, either. For perspective, about 450,000 illegals in Texas received the amnesty out of a statewide population of 15.8 million--or about 2.8%. Texas is still going Red all these years later (although the margins of victory seem to be waning). But nobody says the amnesty turned Texas Blue.
2⃣ Second, California didn't turn Red initially. In 1988, George Bush & the GOP won California. In 1994, Prop 187--the citizen referedum to deny government services to illegals--won handily and helped sweep Republican Pete Wilson into the governor's office.
However, in 1992 California did go for the Democrat Bill Clinton--but on a plurality of the vote, not an absolute majority. That was the year H. Ross Perot played spoiler to George Bush's re-election bid. California likely would have gone to Bush in 1992 otherwise.
3⃣ Third, the demographic transformation of California was well underway before Reagan won the Presidency, and it continued unabated after he left. The White European population of America was 79.5% in 1981 when Reagan took office. It was about 76.5% when he left office in 1989. What seems clear is that short of strong measures to stop and/or reverse the demographic transformation, California was destined to turn Blue sooner or later (and this is, in fact, the Democrat strategy everywhere: dump non-Whites everywhere it can to tranform the electorate into voting Dem). Obviously, the amnesty accelerated the timeline, but in and of itself didn't cause the paradigm shift.
Actual Causes:
The initial cause was the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965 which opened America to all nations of the world, particularly Mexico and other Central American countries in close proximity. This began the decline of the White demographic of the country in general, and California in particular.
Had Prop 187 not been overturned by an activist ✡️ judge, California might well have remained Red and even reversed its demographic transformation. Had congress and the federal government upheld its end of the bargain with respect to the '86 amnesty, the demographic transformation would have been slowed, and maybe even stopped or reversed. Was any of that Reagan's fault? No.
Was it Reagan's fault that 22-65 million illegals would take up permanent residence in the US over the next 35 years? No. Congress was supposed to stop that after the amnesty. Was it Reagan's fault that 35 million legal immigrants were allowed in over those same 35 years? No. Also not Reagan's fault.
Conclusion:
It doesn't look like the amnesty of 1986 is what ruined California or transformed the country. It was an accelerant to be sure, but had it occured in isolation--as a one-time event--it wouldn't have been catastrophic and the country probably could have recovered just fine. However, that's not what happened, so Reagan--being the first mover in an ongoing problem--takes a large brunt of the blame with his amnesty.
Discussion:
That's not to say Reagan was guiltless, though. Far from it. Even though his amnesty wasn't as damaging as is first thought, he inflicted heavy damage to our demographics in a much more insidious and far-reaching way. And that's the topic of the video and post quoted below.
So goes the conventional wisdom from the Dissident Right. But is it true? Let's take a look:
1⃣ First, the population of the US in 1986 was 240 million, and amnesty was granted to about 2.7 million--or 1.1%--which is roughly the same number of people as came into the country through open borders in one year under Joe Biden & Alejandro Mayorkas.
About 1 million illegals were granted amnesty in California, out of a statewide population of 24.5 million--or about 3.7%. Not nothing, but not a massive leap, either. For perspective, about 450,000 illegals in Texas received the amnesty out of a statewide population of 15.8 million--or about 2.8%. Texas is still going Red all these years later (although the margins of victory seem to be waning). But nobody says the amnesty turned Texas Blue.
2⃣ Second, California didn't turn Red initially. In 1988, George Bush & the GOP won California. In 1994, Prop 187--the citizen referedum to deny government services to illegals--won handily and helped sweep Republican Pete Wilson into the governor's office.
However, in 1992 California did go for the Democrat Bill Clinton--but on a plurality of the vote, not an absolute majority. That was the year H. Ross Perot played spoiler to George Bush's re-election bid. California likely would have gone to Bush in 1992 otherwise.
3⃣ Third, the demographic transformation of California was well underway before Reagan won the Presidency, and it continued unabated after he left. The White European population of America was 79.5% in 1981 when Reagan took office. It was about 76.5% when he left office in 1989. What seems clear is that short of strong measures to stop and/or reverse the demographic transformation, California was destined to turn Blue sooner or later (and this is, in fact, the Democrat strategy everywhere: dump non-Whites everywhere it can to tranform the electorate into voting Dem). Obviously, the amnesty accelerated the timeline, but in and of itself didn't cause the paradigm shift.
Actual Causes:
The initial cause was the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965 which opened America to all nations of the world, particularly Mexico and other Central American countries in close proximity. This began the decline of the White demographic of the country in general, and California in particular.
Had Prop 187 not been overturned by an activist ✡️ judge, California might well have remained Red and even reversed its demographic transformation. Had congress and the federal government upheld its end of the bargain with respect to the '86 amnesty, the demographic transformation would have been slowed, and maybe even stopped or reversed. Was any of that Reagan's fault? No.
Was it Reagan's fault that 22-65 million illegals would take up permanent residence in the US over the next 35 years? No. Congress was supposed to stop that after the amnesty. Was it Reagan's fault that 35 million legal immigrants were allowed in over those same 35 years? No. Also not Reagan's fault.
Conclusion:
It doesn't look like the amnesty of 1986 is what ruined California or transformed the country. It was an accelerant to be sure, but had it occured in isolation--as a one-time event--it wouldn't have been catastrophic and the country probably could have recovered just fine. However, that's not what happened, so Reagan--being the first mover in an ongoing problem--takes a large brunt of the blame with his amnesty.
Discussion:
That's not to say Reagan was guiltless, though. Far from it. Even though his amnesty wasn't as damaging as is first thought, he inflicted heavy damage to our demographics in a much more insidious and far-reaching way. And that's the topic of the video and post quoted below.
18
🧵18/ The difference between an "immigrant" and a colonizer/settler/pioneer/founder. You must understand this in order to understand why America is not a "Nation Of Immigrants."
Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯@BasedSamParker
🇺🇸 When Elon Musk establishes the first Mars colony--will we call them "immigrants?" I mean, they came from somewhere else, right?
Of course we won't. We'll call them explorers & colonizers.
The Plymouth & Jamestown colonies weren't "immigrants," either, in any modern sense of the term. (I descend from 2 Mayflower settlers, myself). The American frontier wasn't closed until 1890. A vast portion of those early (proto) Americans of the 17th, 18th & 19th centuries can't properly be called "immigrants"--rather settlers, colonizers & pioneers. Founders.
One of my great, great, great grandmothers came across the Atlantic on a boat to New Orleans and traveled up the Mississippi to St. Louis where her parents died from disease.
She pushed westward on her own to the Utah territory where she got married at 17 to another pioneer man who'd traveled from Illinois. She died at 28, 2 months after giving birth to her 6th child--my great great grandmother.
These people didn't arrive on our shores with free housing, food, healthcare, schools & full civilizational services. They were not "immigrants."
America was not built by immigration. It was built by risk-taking, frontier-minded, pioneering White Christian European colonizers & settlers.
Just because someone came from somewhere else doesn't make them an "immigrant." I'm not an immigrant. And my ancestors weren't immigrants. They were founding Americans who carved a great civilization out of a harsh wilderness.
It's time to dispense with this retarded, weaponized post-1960 propaganda used to justify invading & replacing us.
Of course we won't. We'll call them explorers & colonizers.
The Plymouth & Jamestown colonies weren't "immigrants," either, in any modern sense of the term. (I descend from 2 Mayflower settlers, myself). The American frontier wasn't closed until 1890. A vast portion of those early (proto) Americans of the 17th, 18th & 19th centuries can't properly be called "immigrants"--rather settlers, colonizers & pioneers. Founders.
One of my great, great, great grandmothers came across the Atlantic on a boat to New Orleans and traveled up the Mississippi to St. Louis where her parents died from disease.
She pushed westward on her own to the Utah territory where she got married at 17 to another pioneer man who'd traveled from Illinois. She died at 28, 2 months after giving birth to her 6th child--my great great grandmother.
These people didn't arrive on our shores with free housing, food, healthcare, schools & full civilizational services. They were not "immigrants."
America was not built by immigration. It was built by risk-taking, frontier-minded, pioneering White Christian European colonizers & settlers.
Just because someone came from somewhere else doesn't make them an "immigrant." I'm not an immigrant. And my ancestors weren't immigrants. They were founding Americans who carved a great civilization out of a harsh wilderness.
It's time to dispense with this retarded, weaponized post-1960 propaganda used to justify invading & replacing us.
19
🧵19/ An extraordinary amount of time & effort went into this thread. Please consider supporting me financially since Elon demonetized me & took away my paid subscribers.
BuyMeACoffee, Venmo, PayPal, CashApp & Crypto all available at the link:
Flow.page/SamParkerSenate
BuyMeACoffee, Venmo, PayPal, CashApp & Crypto all available at the link:
Flow.page/SamParkerSenate