Mining for student mistakes (& misconceptions) isn't just good for...

and then taking the opportunity to highlight them, analyse them, and ensure that everyone (not just the mistake maker) learns from them.
and so exposing it and ensuring that everyone is aware of it increases the likelihood that fewer folks make it in the future.
because students become more sensitised to errors and more willing to declare them and wrestle with them.
1/ Seek the permission of the mistake maker...
"Oh, this is a classic mistake! Can I share with the class to help others avoid it?" [said with encouragement]
if peers snicker or mock mistakes, we’ll be no longer have students willing to trust us and share their errors.
create a culture where sharing is revered (mini applause anyone?).
When dealing with mistakes and misconceptions, it's important that we remain aware of the 'mere exposure effect'.
Essentially, we should spend way more time talking about the RIGHT conception as the WRONG one(s).
opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/frontdoo…
+ the plan for / culture of error chapters from TLAC 3.0
• Highlighting and analysing common errors can boost learning and culture.
• This works best when we seek permission, show the mistake authentically, and de-emphasise the individual.
• This only works if we can create a safe space for students to share their work.
👊

BUT it's easier to destroy than develop.
3 ways to flip failure:
↓


