Darwin didn’t derive his theory from “nature itself”— he derived it...
R.Сам 🦋🐏@Logo_Daedalus
46 views
Mar 22, 2025
~1 min read
Advertisement
1
Darwin didn’t derive his theory from “nature itself”— he derived it from reading Malthus. The mythology of Darwin “deriving this from nature itself” exists to obscure this fact.
2
Malthus’s theodicy is one of justifying the ways of satan to man— a benevolent evil, things like starvation & poverty— so “improving population” is taken as “bioleninism” & Jesus is the Antichrist for Malthus. Malthus’s God is the Devil. Do you understand?
3
Darwinian/Malthusian hermeneutics is a metaphysics, which you are not allowed to say— “it’s not a metaphysics it’s just observationally derived”— this is false— Darwin did not “derive this from nature”— he derived it from Malthusian theodicy.
4
This is why darwinists refuse to debate metaphysics & suggest that the field of metaphysics is a fiction— because they cannot defend their metaphysics except by smuggling it into epistemology as “unquestionable truth” & axiom
5
The paradox of tolerance here— “we don’t talk to psuedoscientists”— to “deny darwinism” is to “damn yourself” in their metaphysics. Apostates are not allowed to speak. They are to be exiled for darwinian purposes… they might alter Satanic Providence.