@ProfessorPape: “Two blockades, two clocks.”T...
@ProfessorPape
13 views
Apr 24, 2026
Advertisement
2
The famous claim: sanctions work ~33% of the time.
Reality (after controlling for military force):
<5% success rate
Most “wins” weren’t sanctions at all—they were backed by coups, invasions, or bombing
Sanctions don’t coerce -- They disguise force
Reality (after controlling for military force):
<5% success rate
Most “wins” weren’t sanctions at all—they were backed by coups, invasions, or bombing
Sanctions don’t coerce -- They disguise force
3
More pain ≠ more concession
--Cuba: 60+ years, no regime change.
--Iraq: ~50% GDP collapse in the 1990s—no surrender.
--Russia (2022–): massive sanctions, no strategic reversal.
Why?
Because scarcity strengthens regime's control over what's left
--Cuba: 60+ years, no regime change.
--Iraq: ~50% GDP collapse in the 1990s—no surrender.
--Russia (2022–): massive sanctions, no strategic reversal.
Why?
Because scarcity strengthens regime's control over what's left
4
Sanctions don’t end conflicts.
They transform them.
The Pattern:
Economic pressure -> No results -> Political frustration -> Military escalation
Sanctions aren’t the alternative to war
They’re often the on-ramp to it
They transform them.
The Pattern:
Economic pressure -> No results -> Political frustration -> Military escalation
Sanctions aren’t the alternative to war
They’re often the on-ramp to it
5
Iran today = zero-sum stakes.
Regime survival vs. U.S. credibility
That means:
-- No quick “blink”
-- No short clock (for either)
-- Months of disruption, escalation risk rising
If you want to understand what happens next—and what everyone is getting wrong go to substack Escalation Trap
Live briefing Sunday 5pm ET
Regime survival vs. U.S. credibility
That means:
-- No quick “blink”
-- No short clock (for either)
-- Months of disruption, escalation risk rising
If you want to understand what happens next—and what everyone is getting wrong go to substack Escalation Trap
Live briefing Sunday 5pm ET
