Thread Truncated (Cap Enforced)
Only the first 20 tweets are unrolled into slides to ensure reliable PDF exporting and high server performance.
Canvas & Ratio
Choose your destination platform format
Layout Template
Choose a content structure for your slides
Preset Themes
Typography & Sizing
Brand Kit Customization
AGENCYConfigure brand assets for headers & footers
Outro Slide CTA
Customize your closing call-to-action slide
Background Pattern
Build Your Carousel
Drag and drop any post card below onto a slide, or use the quick buttons to insert content/images instantly!
P L said "was interesting to meet Tarquin today - absolute psycho". He later retweeted the tweet where he referred to SB as a sociopath with a photo of SB. P also on 19 Oct - yet another abusive post about SB and someone SB was with. Said "couldn't hack it as a gay man, now...
... hanging around with a 17yo sociopath who thinks he's a girl" P he must have meant SB - so he knew she was 17yo P later he says "watch how Buffalo Bill uses a camera to hide his face" P responded to another photo tweet saying "here he is defending Fred Wallace's pscyho mate...
... Tarquin." clearly another abusive reference to SB. P in another tweet L refers to SB as "Fred Wallace' sociopath friend" P on 22 Oct he said of SB "he likes to handle people and then complain about being touched himself" P L said "why are you calling a man...
... with long hair 'her'" P then L refers to "Fred's severely disturbed mate" J where is this P gives ref P re Tarquin - L said in answer to a q "oh no... we named him that"
P - someone asked if it T was SB's real name and L said "no it's a reference to his poshness"
P L also wanted to get some info about SB. He tweeted - "if you know him and you want to stop him harassing people please get in touch"
P - under a post about sex harassment L asked "sorry - what woman mate? This is a porn addicted man, like you."
P - another user noted L had admitted throwing the phone of a young trans protestor across the road and was now stalking them online. L replied that Tarquin was a sociopathic misogynist who likes to harass women
P in another reply L said "he's been 17yo for a number of years" and has been harassing women at a conference and was also behind the insect attack at the LGB conference. P C was not harassing women, she was filming at the conference and there is no evidence she had...
... any involvement in the insect attack. P - L also called SB "a scumbag who harasses women" and "if you encounter Tarquin in the wild try to resist the urge to stick his cameras up his arse" P SB felt alarm/distress.
P she did not engage with him online. This was not an argument between two people trading insults. L gave a prepped statement saying T had harassed him by aproaching him and filming him at close quarters. Says he tried to ignore him but C put the phone in his face.
P said it was a reaction to grab the phone. In his statement L also said he did not accept his tweets were harassment. P for an offence of harassment (h) - it has to have happened more than once, it has to be conduct which is oppressive and unacceptable. L takes issue that...
.. his conduct was H. P - it is expected L will raise a defence that his actions were about trying to stop or raise awareness of a crime and that it was reasonable. P - J I have set out some authorities in the opening note, but I can leave them til the end of the case.
P the D does not accept the damage to the phone was by him. Nor that it was reckless. P I call the first witness - SB [someone goes to get SB who is sitting o/s court]
[SB enters court and goes to witness box. Wearing black trousers, blue work shirt. Has long dark hair and is wearing glasses. SB is affirmed. Asks to sit down. J says yes. He is quite posh.]
P - asks name "Sophia [Anne/Anthea?] Brooks" P- when did you start using that name? SB - about 2022 [I think] P - want to ask you about Oct 2024 in QEII centre in London - were you aware of an LBG Alliance event taking place that day SB I was yes
P - broadly speaking do you agree or disagree with their ideas SB - disagree, broadly speaking P - can you briefly explain what your and what LGB's stance is an were you disagree SB - I believe the LGB alliance opposes my rights as a TG person P - in particular?
SB - nothing in particular P - did you go to Westminster on 11 Oct 2024 SB - yes P - what time did you get to QEII vicinity SB - I would have to check my witness statement (WS) P - it's to your right - look at the middle of the first page - it says you arrived around... SB 1700
... hours P so 5pm SB yes P did you go inside. SB no P as of that moment had you heard of L SB yes P aware he was on twitter or X SB yes P any comms with L on any soc med platform SB no P any comms at any point at all ever SB don't believe so
P did you see L at the QEII SB - I don't believe so P - as we will see from soc med posts there were reports of insects being released into the venue SB no I had no prior knowledge of this P have you seen police compilation of tweets by L SB yes [P takes him to them]