Claude just tells you what you want to hear. Every time. You can’t trust it.
So I built a skill that forces 5 AI advisors to argue about your question, anonymously review each other's work, and hand you a verdict you can actually trust.
In this article I'll show you exactly how to set it up.
Here's the method and the exact skill I built, so you can run it yourself:
P.S. If you want more AI workflows like this one delivered to your inbox every week, join 35k readers getting them free: aisolo.beehiiv.com/subscribe
## Why one answer is the problem
Claude is incredibly agreeable.
Ask it "should I launch this product?" and it'll find 5 reasons why you should.
Then ask it "is this product a bad idea?" and it'll find 5 reasons why it is.
Same product, different framing, completely opposite answers.
You've probably noticed this.
You ask a question, get an answer that sounds smart, feel good, and move on.
But that answer was shaped by how you asked it.
• Your assumptions
• Your framing
• Your emotional lean
Claude picked up on all of it and told you what you wanted to hear.
That's fine for writing emails.
It's dangerous for making decisions.
The council breaks this by forcing 5 different thinking styles onto the same question.
Generated by Thread Navigator
Press ⌘ + S to quick-export