Thread Truncated (Cap Enforced)
Only the first 20 tweets are unrolled into slides to ensure reliable PDF exporting and high server performance.
Canvas & Ratio
Choose your destination platform format
Layout Template
Choose a content structure for your slides
Preset Themes
Typography & Sizing
Brand Kit Customization
AGENCYConfigure brand assets for headers & footers
Outro Slide CTA
Customize your closing call-to-action slide
Background Pattern
Build Your Carousel
Drag and drop any post card below onto a slide, or use the quick buttons to insert content/images instantly!

Claude just tells you what you want to hear. Every time. You canβt trust it.


So I built a skill that forces 5 AI advisors to argue about your question, anonymously review each other's work, and hand you a verdict you can actually trust.

In this article I'll show you exactly how to set it up.

Here's the method and the exact skill I built, so you can run it yourself:

<i>P.S. If you want more AI workflows like this one delivered to your inbox every week, join 35k readers getting them free: <b><a target="_blank" href="http://aisolo.beehiiv.com/subscribe" color="blue">aisolo.beehiiv.com/subscribe</a></b></i><b><a target="_blank" href="http://aisolo.beehiiv.com/subscribe" color="blue"></a></b><a target="_blank" href="http://aisolo.beehiiv.com/subscribe" color="blue"></a>

## <b>Why one answer is the problem</b>

Claude is incredibly agreeable.

Ask it "should I launch this product?" and it'll find 5 reasons why you should.

Then ask it "is this product a bad idea?" and it'll find 5 reasons why it is.

Same product, different framing, completely opposite answers.

You've probably noticed this.

You ask a question, get an answer that sounds smart, feel good, and move on.

But that answer was shaped by how you asked it.

β’ Your assumptions

β’ Your framing

β’ Your emotional lean

Claude picked up on all of it and told you what you wanted to hear.

That's fine for writing emails.

It's <b>dangerous</b> for making decisions.

The council breaks this by forcing 5 different thinking styles onto the same question.