Canvas & Ratio
Choose your destination platform format
Layout Template
Choose a content structure for your slides
Preset Themes
Typography & Sizing
Brand Kit Customization
AGENCYConfigure brand assets for headers & footers
Outro Slide CTA
Customize your closing call-to-action slide
Background Pattern
Build Your Carousel
Drag and drop any post card below onto a slide, or use the quick buttons to insert content/images instantly!

The Qur'an's own challenge destroys itself. π₯ Q4:82: "If it had been from other than Allah, they would have found therein much INCONGRUITY." Understand: the canonical qira'at (variant readings) are filled with much INCONGRUITY. π This is fatal for Islam. Thread π§΅π


(1) Dialogue Variants: The Qur'an claims to be Allah's VERBATIM speech. π¬ It's presentation of events should be accurate. Yet, different qiraβat record completely different words spoken by the same people. π³ They canβt *all* be right. File under: 'Scriptwriter plotholes'π




(2) Contradictory Rulings: Qira'at even create conflicting laws. Q2:184: How many poor people to feed? Some say 1 person. Others say multiple "persons" (β₯ 3). Others say "people". Q5:6: Do you **wash** your feet for wudu or just wipe them? This β "Perfect Preservation".




(3) Irregular Arrangement Early dawahganda: "qira'at are just dialects"π Reality: qira'at are a HAPHAZARD mix of Arabic dialects w/ no consistency. Readers arbitrarily combined regional dialects. Some even introduced their own innovations. This is NOT "Perfect Preservation".


(4) The Qurβan fails its own test. β€΅οΈ The challenge: NO inconsistency, NO contradiction, NO irregularity. Yet the qiraβat deliver all three in spades... We are just getting started here. Much more to follow. Β‘Viva la Contradawa! π β Counter-Dawah is Counter-Revolution. βοΈ


This info has been known for YEARS. It's not even the *worst* of it; merely a warm-up. Dawah apologists are well behind the curve. They believe platitudes trump facts. How many 'Lions' will cope via: πΉ Deflections? πΉ 'Inability' to critically consider what was presented?