Hi,👋 we have updated the app and fixed multiple bugs. We are lacking funds, request to free user not to use Adblock. Ads are non intrusive. 😊

Carousel Studio

Repurpose X Threads into LinkedIn & Instagram Carousels

Canvas & Ratio

Choose your destination platform format


Layout Template

Choose a content structure for your slides


Preset Themes


Typography & Sizing

Title Font Size36px
Body Font Size18px
Header & Footer Size12px

Brand Kit Customization

AGENCY

Configure brand assets for headers & footers

MULTI-PROFILES (AGENCY)
AGENCY
SAVE PRESETS (AGENCY)

Outro Slide CTA

Customize your closing call-to-action slide

#1
#2
#3

Background Pattern

Source Content

Build Your Carousel

Drag and drop any post card below onto a slide, or use the quick buttons to insert content/images instantly!

Drag Post #1
Jay49er
@Jay_49erTikTok

#TopDawahDirtDogTricks #TheyLieLieLieLie 🚨Jake Brancatella @MMetaphysician BUSTED🚨 (1/4) Top Dawah is freaking out over the Ahruf dilemma, just as it did over the Islamic Dilemma. We have already watched Orthodox Muslim, Deen Responds, and ISIS Bride 1 Korra get caught making stuff up and sources. Now, a new character has been unlocked, aka it is Jake the Metaphysician's turn. After losing debate after debate, Jake is now trying to rescue the Ahruf from exposing the Quran as the product of Uthman's standardization and Islam as Uthman's Islam, containing no divine text. And to do it, he presented a mutilated quote, hoping nobody would read the next paragraph. This is a four-part beatdown.

Apply Image
Drag Post #2
Jay49er
@Jay_49erTikTok

#HereComeLie and #HereComesTheBelt 2/4 (see Image 1) Jake quoted al-Tahawi saying that "a group held" the seven Ahruf were seven modes or parts of the Quran. He then used that to suggest that Hafs, Warsh, Qalun, and the other recitations can all be treated as different "parts" of one complete Quran. But that is not what the passage is actually discussing. Now look at the "highlighted text" in image 2, taken directly from the book, that Jake conveniently left out. The next lines explain that these "parts" are categories of content: 'command, rebuke, lawful, unlawful, decisive, ambiguous, and parables.'

Apply Image
Apply Image
Drag Post #3
Jay49er
@Jay_49erTikTok

3/4 #HeBroughFraudulentHadith 😭😭😭🤡🤡🤡 Now look at the part Jake conveniently left out. Ahmad bin Abi Imran says: "This interpretation, in my view, is corrupt or unsound." Arabic: هذا التأويل عندي فاسد Then al-Tahawi explicitly agrees: "And it is as Ibn Abi Imran said." Arabic: وهو كما قال ابن أبي عمران So Jake presented a rejected interpretation as though it were al-Tahawi's own classical solution

Apply Image
Drag Post #4
Jay49er
@Jay_49erTikTok

4/4 Jake's argument collapses on every level. #BUSTED - He confused Ahruf with Qiraat. #BUSTED - He turned categories of Quranic content into variant recitations. #BUSTED - He omitted the sentence where the interpretation is declared corrupt. #BUSTED Then he cited the CORRUPTED & rejected view with no shame. Jake's own source does not rescue him. It exposed him.

Drag Post #5
Jay49er
@Jay_49erTikTok

@MMetaphysician Watch @JaiNDoC_RL takedown Jake's lies <a target="_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3LZbb2kTGc&t=793s" color="blue">youtube.com/watch?v=D3LZbb…</a>