Canvas & Ratio
Choose your destination platform format
Layout Template
Choose a content structure for your slides
Preset Themes
Typography & Sizing
Brand Kit Customization
AGENCYConfigure brand assets for headers & footers
Outro Slide CTA
Customize your closing call-to-action slide
Background Pattern
Build Your Carousel
Drag and drop any post card below onto a slide, or use the quick buttons to insert content/images instantly!
🚨 BREAKING: Claude has a feature called Epistemic Audit Mode. You can use it to evaluate the quality of your own thinking, kill hidden assumptions, and know exactly how confident you should be in any decision. Here are 7 prompts to access it: 👇
𝟏/ 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦 𝐃𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐫 Prompt: "I'm working on a decision about [YOUR TOPIC/DECISION]. Here is my current thinking: [PASTE YOUR REASONING, ARGUMENT, OR PLAN] Break this down into every individual claim I'm making, whether stated or implied. Number each claim separately. For each claim, classify it as: - Empirical (testable with data) - Logical (follows from other claims) - Assumption (taken as given, no evidence provided) - Value judgment (based on preference, not fact) Don't evaluate them yet. Just decompose and classify."
𝟐/ 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐑𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐫 Prompt: "Now take each empirical claim from the decomposition above. For each one, evaluate the evidence: 1. What is the source? (peer-reviewed, anecdotal, self-reported, industry report, no source) 2. How recent is it? (current, outdated, unknown) 3. Sample size or scope? (large-scale, case study, single example, N/A) 4. Could this be cherry-picked to support my position? Rate each claim: STRONG / MODERATE / WEAK / UNSUPPORTED. Be harsh. I want accuracy, not reassurance."
𝟑/ 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐦𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐄𝐱𝐜𝐚𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫 Prompt: "Now focus on the claims you classified as 'Assumption.' For each assumption: 1. Why am I assuming this? (personal experience, common belief, someone told me, default thinking) 2. What would change if this assumption is wrong? 3. Is there a scenario where this assumption completely breaks? 4. What's the strongest argument AGAINST this assumption? Flag any assumption where being wrong would change my entire conclusion. These are my critical load-bearing assumptions."
𝟒/ 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐲 𝐌𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐫 Prompt: "Create an uncertainty map for my entire argument. For every claim (empirical, logical, assumption, and value judgment), assign a confidence score from 0-100%. Format it as a table: | Claim | Type | Confidence | Why | Sort by confidence, lowest first. Any claim below 60% confidence is a vulnerability in my reasoning. Highlight the 3 weakest links in my entire argument. These are where I should focus my research before making this decision."
𝟓/ 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐩𝐨𝐭 𝐒𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐫 Prompt: "Now tell me what I'm NOT considering. Based on my argument, identify: 1. Questions I should be asking but haven't 2. Data I should look at but didn't mention 3. Stakeholders or perspectives I've ignored 4. Second-order consequences I haven't mapped 5. Historical precedents where similar reasoning failed Don't be polite about it. The whole point is to find what I can't see from inside my own thinking."
𝟔/ 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐞𝐞𝐥 𝐌𝐚𝐧 𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭 Prompt: "Build the strongest possible argument AGAINST my position. Not a straw man. A steel man. Use my own weak claims, unsupported assumptions, and blind spots from the previous analysis. Structure it as if you're a world-class debater trying to convince ME that I'm wrong. Then tell me: on a scale of 1-10, how damaging is this counter-argument to my original position? And what would I need to prove to survive it?"
𝟕/ 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐩𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐒𝐮𝐦𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐁𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐟 Prompt: "Produce a final Epistemic Summary Brief for my decision. Include: 1. OVERALL CONFIDENCE: A single percentage for how well-supported my position is 2. STRONGEST CLAIMS: The 3 claims I can rely on 3. WEAKEST CLAIMS: The 3 claims that need more evidence 4. CRITICAL ASSUMPTIONS: Load-bearing beliefs I haven't verified 5. BLIND SPOTS: Top 3 things I wasn't considering 6. RECOMMENDED NEXT STEPS: Exactly what I should research, test, or reconsider before committing Write it as a one-page executive brief I can reference before making my final call."
Epistemic thinking is the meta-skill behind every good decision. Most people ask AI "what should I do?" These prompts force AI to ask "how confident should you be in what you already think?" That's the difference between using AI as a search engine and using it as a thinking partner. Follow me @alex_prompter for more prompts like these.