Hi,šŸ‘‹ we have updated the app and fixed multiple bugs. We are lacking funds, request to free user not to use Adblock. Ads are non intrusive. 😊

Carousel Studio

Repurpose X Threads into LinkedIn & Instagram Carousels

Canvas & Ratio

Choose your destination platform format


Layout Template

Choose a content structure for your slides


Preset Themes


Typography & Sizing

Title Font Size36px
Body Font Size18px
Header & Footer Size12px

Brand Kit Customization

AGENCY

Configure brand assets for headers & footers

MULTI-PROFILES (AGENCY)
AGENCY
SAVE PRESETS (AGENCY)

Outro Slide CTA

Customize your closing call-to-action slide

#1
#2
#3

Background Pattern

Source Content

Build Your Carousel

Drag and drop any post card below onto a slide, or use the quick buttons to insert content/images instantly!

Drag Post #1
Seres IstvƔn AndrƔs
@Istvan_A_Seres

šŸš€New paper: Private Delegation of (Non-)Membership Proof Updates in Cryptographic Accumulators Ever tried to use accumulators in practice? Then you’ve hit the wall: every update breaks everyone’s proofs. We fix that. 🧵1/n

Apply Image
Apply Image
Drag Post #2
Seres IstvƔn AndrƔs
@Istvan_A_Seres

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz šŸ”„The core problem: Cryptographic accumulators compress huge sets (e.g., set of unspent coins) into tiny digests. But… when the set changes: āž”ļø ALL membership proofs become outdated āž”ļø Clients must recompute them This kills usability for mobile/offline users. 2/n

Drag Post #3
Seres IstvƔn AndrƔs
@Istvan_A_Seres

This isn’t just annoying — it’s fundamental. Recent lower bounds show: šŸ‘‰ You can’t avoid frequent proof updates without blowing up the state size. So the question becomes: Can we privately outsource (non-)membership proof updates? 3/n

Drag Post #4
Seres IstvƔn AndrƔs
@Istvan_A_Seres

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz Naively outsourcing fails!āŒ If you send your (non-)membership proof to a server: šŸ‘‰ it can brute-force which element you own. Privacy = gone. Even worse in systems like Zcash, anonymous credentials, or key transparency. 4/n

Drag Post #5
Seres IstvƔn AndrƔs
@Istvan_A_Seres

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz šŸ’”Our idea: Let clients delegate (non-)membership proof updates to an untrusted server… BUT: šŸ”’ without revealing which element they care about ⚔ with constant client work āœ… and publicly verifiable correctness 5/n

Apply Image
Drag Post #6
Seres IstvƔn AndrƔs
@Istvan_A_Seres

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz We introduce a new primitive: šŸ‘‰ Private delegation of accumulator proof updates Formalized with: • correctness • delegation soundness • (strong + weak) privacy guarantees 6/n

Drag Post #7
Seres IstvƔn AndrƔs
@Istvan_A_Seres

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz 🧠 Key trick: Before sending a (non-)membership proof to the server, the client: šŸ‘‰ blinds it The server updates the blinded (non-)membership proof → learns nothing about the underlying element 7/n

Apply Image
Drag Post #8
Seres IstvƔn AndrƔs
@Istvan_A_Seres

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz Then: āœ” Server returns updated blinded proof āœ” Anyone can verify the update was correct āœ” Client unblinds → gets valid fresh (non-)membership proof All without revealing the element x šŸ‘€ 8/n

Drag Post #9
Seres IstvƔn AndrƔs
@Istvan_A_Seres

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz ⚔Performance highlight: Client update cost: šŸ‘‰ O(1) (constant time!) Previous work: šŸ‘‰ O(k) or even O(sqrt(k)) This is a huge win for resource-constrained devices. 9/n

Apply Image
Drag Post #10
Seres IstvƔn AndrƔs
@Istvan_A_Seres

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz šŸ— We build concrete schemes for: • RSA accumulators • Bilinear accumulators Both supporting efficient private delegation for (non-)membership proofs. 10/n

Drag Post #11
Seres IstvƔn AndrƔs
@Istvan_A_Seres

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz For RSA accumulators: ✨ Simple but powerful trick: Randomize proof → exponentiate → prove consistency with NIZKs Result: āœ” efficient āœ” practical āœ” ~7% overhead vs non-private baseline 11/n

Apply Image
Drag Post #12
Seres IstvƔn AndrƔs
@Istvan_A_Seres

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz We also support: āœ” membership proofs āœ” non-membership proofs āœ” batching of updates All privately delegated. 12/n

Drag Post #13
Seres IstvƔn AndrƔs
@Istvan_A_Seres

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz 🧾 Public verifiability is key: The server can produce a proof that: šŸ‘‰ ā€œI updated this correctlyā€ Anyone can check it. This enables: šŸ’° markets for proof-serving nodes. 13/n

Drag Post #14
Seres IstvƔn AndrƔs
@Istvan_A_Seres

🧠 Why this matters: Applications include: • Stateless blockchains • Anonymous credentials (revocation) • Registration-based encryption • Transparency logs 14/n

Drag Post #15
Seres IstvƔn AndrƔs
@Istvan_A_Seres

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz Example: stateless blockchains Without our approach: šŸ‘‰ you must stay online to keep proofs fresh With us: šŸ‘‰ go offline, come back, outsource updates privately It turns out that running a server for delegating proofs in a stateless blockchain is pretty cheap. 15/n

Apply Image
Drag Post #16
Seres IstvƔn AndrƔs
@Istvan_A_Seres

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz 🧪Bonus: We built an open-source implementationšŸ”§ šŸ‘‰ First real system for private accumulator proof delegation 3...2...1...Delegate! <a target="_blank" href="https://github.com/GlaszBoti/private-accumulator-proof-delegation" color="blue">github.com/GlaszBoti/priv…</a> 16/n

Drag Post #17
Seres IstvƔn AndrƔs
@Istvan_A_Seres

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz Open problems, directions Private delegation for other authenticated data structures: vector commitments, authenticated dictionaries, etc. Private delegation for PQ-secure accumulators Multi-server private delegation schemes for better liveness 17/n

Drag Post #18
Seres IstvƔn AndrƔs
@Istvan_A_Seres

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz Let us know if you have any comments, feedback, critique, etc. Tolle, lege: <a target="_blank" href="https://eprint.iacr.org/2026/832.pdf" color="blue">eprint.iacr.org/2026/832.pdf</a> Q.E.D. Fin! 18/18