Canvas & Ratio
Choose your destination platform format
Layout Template
Choose a content structure for your slides
Preset Themes
Typography & Sizing
Brand Kit Customization
AGENCYConfigure brand assets for headers & footers
Outro Slide CTA
Customize your closing call-to-action slide
Background Pattern
Build Your Carousel
Drag and drop any post card below onto a slide, or use the quick buttons to insert content/images instantly!

šNew paper: Private Delegation of (Non-)Membership Proof Updates in Cryptographic Accumulators Ever tried to use accumulators in practice? Then youāve hit the wall: every update breaks everyoneās proofs. We fix that. š§µ1/n



@0xSooki @BotiGlasz š„The core problem: Cryptographic accumulators compress huge sets (e.g., set of unspent coins) into tiny digests. But⦠when the set changes: ā”ļø ALL membership proofs become outdated ā”ļø Clients must recompute them This kills usability for mobile/offline users. 2/n

This isnāt just annoying ā itās fundamental. Recent lower bounds show: š You canāt avoid frequent proof updates without blowing up the state size. So the question becomes: Can we privately outsource (non-)membership proof updates? 3/n

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz Naively outsourcing fails!ā If you send your (non-)membership proof to a server: š it can brute-force which element you own. Privacy = gone. Even worse in systems like Zcash, anonymous credentials, or key transparency. 4/n

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz š”Our idea: Let clients delegate (non-)membership proof updates to an untrusted server⦠BUT: š without revealing which element they care about ā” with constant client work ā and publicly verifiable correctness 5/n


@0xSooki @BotiGlasz We introduce a new primitive: š Private delegation of accumulator proof updates Formalized with: ⢠correctness ⢠delegation soundness ⢠(strong + weak) privacy guarantees 6/n

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz š§ Key trick: Before sending a (non-)membership proof to the server, the client: š blinds it The server updates the blinded (non-)membership proof ā learns nothing about the underlying element 7/n


@0xSooki @BotiGlasz Then: ā Server returns updated blinded proof ā Anyone can verify the update was correct ā Client unblinds ā gets valid fresh (non-)membership proof All without revealing the element x š 8/n

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz ā”Performance highlight: Client update cost: š O(1) (constant time!) Previous work: š O(k) or even O(sqrt(k)) This is a huge win for resource-constrained devices. 9/n


@0xSooki @BotiGlasz š We build concrete schemes for: ⢠RSA accumulators ⢠Bilinear accumulators Both supporting efficient private delegation for (non-)membership proofs. 10/n

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz For RSA accumulators: ⨠Simple but powerful trick: Randomize proof ā exponentiate ā prove consistency with NIZKs Result: ā efficient ā practical ā ~7% overhead vs non-private baseline 11/n


@0xSooki @BotiGlasz We also support: ā membership proofs ā non-membership proofs ā batching of updates All privately delegated. 12/n

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz š§¾ Public verifiability is key: The server can produce a proof that: š āI updated this correctlyā Anyone can check it. This enables: š° markets for proof-serving nodes. 13/n

š§ Why this matters: Applications include: ⢠Stateless blockchains ⢠Anonymous credentials (revocation) ⢠Registration-based encryption ⢠Transparency logs 14/n

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz Example: stateless blockchains Without our approach: š you must stay online to keep proofs fresh With us: š go offline, come back, outsource updates privately It turns out that running a server for delegating proofs in a stateless blockchain is pretty cheap. 15/n


@0xSooki @BotiGlasz š§ŖBonus: We built an open-source implementationš§ š First real system for private accumulator proof delegation 3...2...1...Delegate! <a target="_blank" href="https://github.com/GlaszBoti/private-accumulator-proof-delegation" color="blue">github.com/GlaszBoti/privā¦</a> 16/n

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz Open problems, directions Private delegation for other authenticated data structures: vector commitments, authenticated dictionaries, etc. Private delegation for PQ-secure accumulators Multi-server private delegation schemes for better liveness 17/n

@0xSooki @BotiGlasz Let us know if you have any comments, feedback, critique, etc. Tolle, lege: <a target="_blank" href="https://eprint.iacr.org/2026/832.pdf" color="blue">eprint.iacr.org/2026/832.pdf</a> Q.E.D. Fin! 18/18