Carousel Studio

Repurpose X Threads into LinkedIn & Instagram Carousels

Canvas & Ratio

Choose your destination platform format


Layout Template

Choose a content structure for your slides


Preset Themes


Typography & Sizing

Title Font Size36px
Body Font Size18px
Header & Footer Size12px

Brand Kit Customization

AGENCY

Configure brand assets for headers & footers

MULTI-PROFILES (AGENCY)
AGENCY
SAVE PRESETS (AGENCY)

Outro Slide CTA

Customize your closing call-to-action slide

#1
#2
#3

Background Pattern

Source Content

Build Your Carousel

Drag and drop any post card below onto a slide, or use the quick buttons to insert content/images instantly!

Drag Post #1
Brian Feroldi
@BrianFeroldi

The P/E ratio SUCKS. It’s a flawed metric that deceives investors. Here's exactly why the P/E ratio can be INCREDIBLY misleading (and what to use instead):

Apply Image
Drag Post #2
Brian Feroldi
@BrianFeroldi

The P/E ratio's flaw is that the "earnings” can be misleading. If “earnings” aren’t sustainable, or are artificially inflated/depressed, the P/E ratio will be wrong. Here's all the reasons why that can happen...

Drag Post #3
Brian Feroldi
@BrianFeroldi

1: Accrual Accounting The GAAP income statement uses accrual accounting. Accrual accounting is useful, but it’s basically an accountant’s opinion. Here are some of the expenses that can cause “earnings” to be higher or lower than the actual cash flow of a business

Apply Image
Drag Post #4
Brian Feroldi
@BrianFeroldi

Ex: In 2019, $NFLX reported $1.9 billion in "earnings", but its operating cash flow was NEGATIVE $2.9 billion While it was “profitable” on a net income basis, its actual cash outflow was enormous. The P/E ratio doesn’t reflect this at all

Apply Image
Drag Post #5
Brian Feroldi
@BrianFeroldi

2: Equity investments Some companies buy stock in other public (Ex: $SHOP owns $AFRM stock) GAAP marks UP “earnings” when their investments increase in value and DOWN when they decline, making the P/E ratio useless

Apply Image
Drag Post #6
Brian Feroldi
@BrianFeroldi

3: One-time events Companies receive windfalls from taxes, asset sales, and one-off deals. When this happens, “earnings” can SKYROCKET, which causes the P/E ratio to temporarily plunge

Apply Image
Drag Post #7
Brian Feroldi
@BrianFeroldi

Ex: $SBUX in 2018 Starbucks received a $1.4 billion payment from Nestle. This HUGELY boosted earnings, which artificially DEPRESSED the P/E for a year, which made it a deceiving metric.

Apply Image
Drag Post #8
Brian Feroldi
@BrianFeroldi

4: Unsustainable trend When profits are fueled by a short-term demand, the P/E ratio can plunge, but it's a mirage. Ex: $GILD launched two drugs in 2014 that cured patients of Hepatitis C. Profits EXPLODED, which caused the P/E ratio to fall to just 8!

Apply Image
Drag Post #9
Brian Feroldi
@BrianFeroldi

But Gilead's profits were unsustainable. Earnings fell sharply, which caused the P/E ratio to expand. If you bought because of the “cheap” P/E ratio (like me), you did poorly.

Apply Image
Drag Post #10
Brian Feroldi
@BrianFeroldi

5: Disruption When a company's business gets disrupted, earnings are in a permanent state of decline. $GE's earnings grew for 100+ years, and in 2008 its P/E ratio was just 14. Reasonable, right?

Apply Image
Drag Post #11
Brian Feroldi
@BrianFeroldi

But $GE had made a series of bets that didn’t pay off, in part due to disruption. GE's net income was at a peak, so its P/E ratio was understated. Shares fell hard over the next few years, even though investors thought they were buying at a reasonable P/E ratio.

Apply Image
Drag Post #12
Brian Feroldi
@BrianFeroldi

6: Cyclical demand Some industries are prone to booms and busts, like energy, industrials, commodities, housing... Earnings explode during boom times and crash during bust times.For these companies, the P/E ratio works backward

Apply Image
Drag Post #13
Brian Feroldi
@BrianFeroldi

Ex: $XOM Profits surge when energy prices are high (2022) and sink when they fall. The WORST time to invest is at a cyclical peak, which is when the P/E ratio looks cheapest (the inverse is also true)

Apply Image
Drag Post #14
Brian Feroldi
@BrianFeroldi

7: Industry Dynamics The P/E ratio doesn't work at all in some industries. Ex: 🏦 Banks: Credit cycles 🧑‍🔬 Biotech: Losses, then a big payout 🏘️ REITs: High depreciation charges

Drag Post #15
Brian Feroldi
@BrianFeroldi

8: Business Growth Cycle Companies in phases 1, 2, or 3 are optimized for GROWTH, not <a target="_blank" href="http://profits.Management" color="blue">profits.Management</a> plows all available resources into hiring &amp; expansion. This artificially UNDERSTATES the earnings power of the business, which artificially OVERSTATES the P/E ratio.

Apply Image
Drag Post #16
Brian Feroldi
@BrianFeroldi

This is why $AMZN was called "insanely expensive" for years. For decades, it was optimized for growth, not earnings, which caused the P/E ratio to look crazy In 2017, it started to optimize for earnings (although COVID messed this up)

Apply Image
Drag Post #17
Brian Feroldi
@BrianFeroldi

What should investors do? Learn when the P/E ratio is USEFUL and when it’s USELESS (see chart).

Apply Image
Drag Post #18
Brian Feroldi
@BrianFeroldi

*Key Question* What part of the income statement is the company optimized for? Sales ➡️ P/S ratio Gross Profit ➡️ P/Gross Profit ratio Operating Income➡️ P/EBIT ratio Earnings➡️ P/E Ratio Free Cash Flow➡️P/FCF Ratio

Apply Image
Drag Post #19
Brian Feroldi
@BrianFeroldi

I teach investors how to analyze businesses. If this thread was useful, follow me @BrianFeroldi. To share with your followers, ♻️ retweet the first tweet below: <a target="_blank" href="https://twitter.com/61558281/status/1956685992217219543" color="blue">x.com/61558281/statu…</a>