Carousel Studio

Repurpose X Threads into LinkedIn & Instagram Carousels

Canvas & Ratio

Choose your destination platform format


Layout Template

Choose a content structure for your slides


Preset Themes


Typography & Sizing

Title Font Size36px
Body Font Size18px
Header & Footer Size12px

Brand Kit Customization

AGENCY

Configure brand assets for headers & footers

MULTI-PROFILES (AGENCY)
AGENCY
SAVE PRESETS (AGENCY)

Outro Slide CTA

Customize your closing call-to-action slide

#1
#2
#3

Background Pattern

Source Content

Build Your Carousel

Drag and drop any post card below onto a slide, or use the quick buttons to insert content/images instantly!

Drag Post #1
Brad Setser
@Brad_Setser

To state the obvious, a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and a 10% tariff on China, if sustained, would be a massive shock -- a much bigger move in one weekend than all the trade action that Trump took in his first term 1/x

Apply Image
Drag Post #2
Brad Setser
@Brad_Setser

The just pay it cost of the tariffs on Mexico and Canada would be about 0.8 pp of US GDP (imports are ~ 3.2% of GDP). The just pay it cost is crude, but it usually a pretty good rough guide the actual impact -- as many effects offset. 2/

Drag Post #3
Brad Setser
@Brad_Setser

The 10% tariff on the 1.5% of US GDP that the US still imports from China ($400b or so in the US data) adds another 15 bp of GDP to the total, and brings the total "just pay it cost" up to about 1 pp of US GDP (leaving out retaliation) 3/

Drag Post #4
Brad Setser
@Brad_Setser

And there aren't any offsetting tax cuts right now, this is basically a 1 pp of GDP regressive tax hike (hard to get around a tariff suddenly imposed unless you try to wait it out) 4/

Drag Post #5
Brad Setser
@Brad_Setser

By comparison, the full Trump 1 tariffs on China amounted to a 15 pp increase in the tariff level (from 3 to 18%) on 2.6% of GDP, or a 0.4 pp of GDP tariff hike in "just pay it" terms. And that tariff was phased in over 2 years. 5/

Drag Post #6
Brad Setser
@Brad_Setser

So this is easily 2x bigger in economic terms than all of the Trump term 1 tariffs on China -- 6/

Drag Post #7
Brad Setser
@Brad_Setser

The biggest single action in the US-China trade war was raising "list 3" tariffs from 10 to 25%. That impacted $200b of imports: the just pay it cost was $30b (15 bp of GDP back then). The 10% tariff on $400b from China is bigger in dollar terms and comparable in GDP terms. 7/

Drag Post #8
Brad Setser
@Brad_Setser

These tariffs are all intended as "leverage" (even the 10% tariff on China) so they may not be permanent and may not have the full annual impact, but make no mistake, this is a major tax hike -- and this analysis also leaves out retaliation 8/

Drag Post #9
Brad Setser
@Brad_Setser

And one little tidbit - the 10% across the board tariff will hit $40-50b in iPhone imports. The import cost of a phone is around $00 a phone, so less than the retail cost. Will see what Apple chooses to do with its prices ... 9/

Drag Post #10
Brad Setser
@Brad_Setser

But an across the board tariff means hitting the goods (iphones, many toys) that Trump's term 1 team intentionally left out their lists, for various reasons (Tim Cook's lobbying, a desire to avoid raising consumer prices before Xmas, etc) 10/10