Thread Truncated (Cap Enforced)
Only the first 20 tweets are unrolled into slides to ensure reliable PDF exporting and high server performance.
Canvas & Ratio
Choose your destination platform format
Layout Template
Choose a content structure for your slides
Preset Themes
Typography & Sizing
Brand Kit Customization
AGENCYConfigure brand assets for headers & footers
Outro Slide CTA
Customize your closing call-to-action slide
Background Pattern
Build Your Carousel
Drag and drop any post card below onto a slide, or use the quick buttons to insert content/images instantly!
"Flowers of the Red Army" A response to @KeithWoodsYT's recent article and the disillusionned right-wing's critique of Marxism - 🧵
Recently, I have been engaging with a lot more right-wingers… and what a revelation! They have no idea what they are doing as much as the current left! Their critiques of Marxism are outdated while they're being outpaced by figures such as Hinkle.
Keith Woods, your favorite white nationalist, published a new article criticizing Marxism. Let us respond. -Marxism is failed ideology The first and immediate right-wing impression of Marxism is that it is a “failed ideology”. As Keith Woods says:
But the question to ask is: by what standard exactly? The irony is that, the right-winger, when he says that Marxism failed, follows the same exact standard of victory that the pan-leftists preach.
He thinks the success of Marxism would be a motherly embrace of nature and an anarchic society with no moral imperatives. But this is not a standard of victory - this is a mere fantasy of 20th century hippie-leftists.
On the grounds of a real victory, which is simply the maximum propagation and instantiation of revolutionary methods - the real movement - Marxism is actually the ONLY ideology that has EVER won after modern liberalism.
Only Marxists have succeeded in founding the powerful empires outside liberal modernity, these being the USSR and modern China, that have given the breathing room for peripheral sovereign countries to form (Iran, Cuba, Vietnam, North Korea, etc).
The fascists, the anarchists, the social-democrats, the nationalists and the libertarians have all either been completely integrated into liberal modernity or, in the case of the libertarians, never have been able to be sovereign and WIN. Why is it then that Marxism WINS?
This is a question that stupefies the right-wing. Thus, they resort to metaphysical explanations to explain the event of communism: that it was the JEWS, that it is because of RACE or that it is the slavish WOKE-CHRISTIANS.
All of these explanations do not explain the ground of possibility of Marxist victory.
Metaphysical explanations give supra-material grounds for events, as if certain ethnicities, races or religions had the powers to circumvent the laws of material reality and instantiate their victory. Let us showcase the absurdity of this type of explanation.
Let’s say that the JEWS completely CREATED Marxism and PROPAGATED it (even though Marx’s ideas were fundamentally Christian and his followers all the same).
Now, for them to be able to do so, you need a country that is; not sovereign politically, divided to the utmost limit of class composition because of imperialism (peasants and the noble-bourgeois are an example in Tsarist Russia), culturally and intellectually backwards (i.e…
…education introduces them to revolutionary ideals). All of these CONDITIONS are objective and INDEPENDENT from individuals. IN OTHER WORDS, it doesn’t fucking matter what “individual” leads the peasants - IT WAS BOUND TO HAPPEN.
Jews do NOT have mystical powers to CREATE these objective conditions. Therefore, communism can NOT be a Jewish creation but an OBJECTIVE EVENT.
The same can be said for any other metaphysical place-holder the right-wing tries to ascribe to Marxism - lower-class races, Christian wokes, etc. Then, why is it that the MARXISTS win and not any other political group?
Well, it is simple; Marxists simply had the best ANSWER to modernity, in that their answer was based on a scientific apprehension of the class conditions in Europe, Russia, China, etc. For example, the Marxists would answer to the Narodniks (the previous Christian peasant…
…revolutionaries of Russia) that they did not ally with the fundamental FORCE that existed in Russia - that is, the URBAN proletariat. Their focus on the peasantry because of ideological reasons (mainly Christianity) lead them to failure.
But when the Marxists allied with BOTH the proletariat and the peasantry - they WON. Thus, Marxist CLASS ANALYSIS is what leads to victory. And this is the justification of materialism Woods is looking for.
Only materialism can be self-critical, renounce metaphysical explanations and locate the objective conditions of victory. Therefore, only Marxists win.