Claude Fable 5 cost ~$6.2K to run the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index benchmarks - the most expensive model we have ever benchmarked π§΅
Key takeaways:
β€ Intelligence Index: 60, ahead of Claude Opus 4.8 (56) and GPT-5.5 (55)
β€ Cost to run the Intelligence Index: $6.2K, 1.7Γ the next-highest model (Opus 4.8, $3.7K) and 2.2Γ GPT-5.5 (xhigh, $2.9K)
β€ List price: $10/$50 per 1M input/output tokens, 2Γ Opus 4.8. Among 2026 releases, only OpenAI's special Pro tier (GPT-5.5 Pro, $30/$180) is priced higher
β€ Cache pricing, which is particularly important for long agentic coding sessions, doubled too: $1/M cache reads, and $12.50/M cache writes vs $0.50/$6.25 for Opus 4.8
β€ The top 3 most-expensive models to run the Intelligence Index are now all Claude models

Where does the $6,228 come from? The token counts, plus our v4.1 cost methodology:
Fable 5 consumed 676M tokens to run our Intelligence Index: 590M input, 76.5M reasoning, and 9.8M answer tokens. At Fable 5's, without considering cached inputs would be ~$10,215, but v4.1 prices cached tokens at cache rates and credits fallback tasks to Opus 4.8, bringing the total cost down to $6,228.
Highlights to consider:
β€ Cache is the biggest lever: most of Fable 5's input is cached, billed at $1/M (reads) and $12.50/M (writes) rather than $10/M, cutting input cost from ~$5,900 to ~$2,050
β€ Automatic fallback: ~8% of tasks were served by Claude Opus 4.8 at $5/$25, trimming a further ~$275 off
β€ The record cost is not driven by verbosity: Fable 5 generated ~26M fewer output tokens than Opus 4.8. Cost increase is mainly driven by the 2Γ token price increase.
Fable 5 consumed 676M tokens to run our Intelligence Index: 590M input, 76.5M reasoning, and 9.8M answer tokens. At Fable 5's, without considering cached inputs would be ~$10,215, but v4.1 prices cached tokens at cache rates and credits fallback tasks to Opus 4.8, bringing the total cost down to $6,228.
Highlights to consider:
β€ Cache is the biggest lever: most of Fable 5's input is cached, billed at $1/M (reads) and $12.50/M (writes) rather than $10/M, cutting input cost from ~$5,900 to ~$2,050
β€ Automatic fallback: ~8% of tasks were served by Claude Opus 4.8 at $5/$25, trimming a further ~$275 off
β€ The record cost is not driven by verbosity: Fable 5 generated ~26M fewer output tokens than Opus 4.8. Cost increase is mainly driven by the 2Γ token price increase.

Claude now has four pricing tiers, and the new top rung is priced at exactly 2Γ the old one.
Fable 5 is the first Claude tier to launch above Opus, doubling flagship pricing across every token type. Anthropic's lineup now spans 10Γ from bottom to top (USD per 1M input/output tokens):
β€ Haiku 4.5 β $1 / $5
β€ Sonnet 4.6 β $3 / $15
β€ Opus 4.8 β $5 / $25
β€ Fable 5 β $10 / $50
It is also the first time Anthropic has raised its flagship price: $15/$75 held from Claude 3 Opus through Opus 4.1, was cut to $5/$25 with Opus 4.5, and stayed there through Opus 4.8 until now.
Fable 5 is the first Claude tier to launch above Opus, doubling flagship pricing across every token type. Anthropic's lineup now spans 10Γ from bottom to top (USD per 1M input/output tokens):
β€ Haiku 4.5 β $1 / $5
β€ Sonnet 4.6 β $3 / $15
β€ Opus 4.8 β $5 / $25
β€ Fable 5 β $10 / $50
It is also the first time Anthropic has raised its flagship price: $15/$75 held from Claude 3 Opus through Opus 4.1, was cut to $5/$25 with Opus 4.5, and stayed there through Opus 4.8 until now.

Methodology note: these figures use v4.1 of the Intelligence Index, which now prices cached tokens from agentic evaluations at cache read/write rates rather than full input price, better reflecting real cost on cache-heavy evals.
Where a model routes requests to a fallback, our cost-to-run figures also price each token at the rates of the model that actually served it, and Fable 5 appears on our charts as "Claude Fable 5 (with fallback)".
In the future, we will also break out intelligence scoring for models with fallback or refusal behavior, so it is visible how much of a score is earned by the headline model itself.
Judge whether the intelligence gains justify the premium: see Intelligence vs Cost π
artificialanalysis.ai/?cost=intelligβ¦
Where a model routes requests to a fallback, our cost-to-run figures also price each token at the rates of the model that actually served it, and Fable 5 appears on our charts as "Claude Fable 5 (with fallback)".
In the future, we will also break out intelligence scoring for models with fallback or refusal behavior, so it is visible how much of a score is earned by the headline model itself.
Judge whether the intelligence gains justify the premium: see Intelligence vs Cost π
artificialanalysis.ai/?cost=intelligβ¦
Generated by Thread Navigator
Press β + S to quick-export
