We've been building an internal Claude Code plugin system at Intercom with 13 plugins, 100+ skills, and hooks that turn Claude into a full-stack engineering platform. Lots done, more to do. Here's a thread of some highlights.
The wildest one: we gave Claude a read-only Rails production console via MCP. Claude can now execute arbitrary Ruby against production data - feature flag checks, business logic validation, cache state inspection etc.
Safety gates: read-replica only, blocked critical tables, mandatory model verification before every query, Okta auth, DynamoDB audit trail. I launched it by saying "It is either the worst thing in the world that will ruin Intercom, or complete genius."
It is used a lot. No issues so far. Last time I looked the top-5 users weren't engineers - design managers, customer support engineers, product management leaders were all actively using it!
The console is part of a broader Admin Tools MCP that gives Claude the same production visibility engineers have: Customer/feature flag/admin lookups etc. A skill-level gate blocks all these tools until Claude loads the safety reference docs first. No cowboy queries.
We instrumented every Claude Code lifecycle event with OpenTelemetry. SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, PreToolUse, PostToolUse, PermissionRequest, SubagentStart... 14 event types flowing to Honeycomb. Privacy-first: we explicitly never capture user prompts, messages, or tool input
Session transcripts sync to S3 (with username SHA256-hashed for privacy). We can analyze how people actually use Claude at scale. On SessionEnd, a hook analyzes the entire session transcript with Claude Haiku looking for improvement opportunities.
It auto-classifies gaps (missing_skill, missing_tool, repeated_failure, wrong_info) and posts to Slack with a pre-filled GitHub issue URL. This creates a feedback loop: real sessions -> detected gaps -> GitHub issues -> new skills -> better sessions.
Our flaky test fixer is a 9-step forensic investigation workflow with a 20-category taxonomy of flakiness patterns. Hard rules:
- NEVER skip a spec as a "fix"
- NEVER guess root cause without CI error data
- Downloads failure data from S3, classifies against the taxonomy
- NEVER skip a spec as a "fix"
- NEVER guess root cause without CI error data
- Downloads failure data from S3, classifies against the taxonomy
Sweeps for "sibling" instances of the same antipattern. Fixes common patterns widely. This matters a lot when you've got hundreds of thousands of tests.
Claude Code hooks enforce our PR workflow at the shell level and blocks it unless the create-pr skill was activated first
1. A PreToolUse hook intercepts raw gh pr create
2. The skill extracts business INTENT before creating - asks "why?" not just "what changed?"
1. A PreToolUse hook intercepts raw gh pr create
2. The skill extracts business INTENT before creating - asks "why?" not just "what changed?"
3. Another hook blocks ALL modifications to merged PR branches (push, commit, rebase, edit)
4. After PR creation, a background agent auto-monitors CI checks using ETag-based polling (zero rate-limit cost)
4. After PR creation, a background agent auto-monitors CI checks using ETag-based polling (zero rate-limit cost)
After 5 permission prompts in a session, a hook suggests running the permissions analyzer. It scans your last 14 days of session transcripts, extracts every Bash command approved, and classifies them:
- GREEN: ls, grep, test runners
- YELLOW: git, mkdir
- RED rm, sudo, curl etc.
- GREEN: ls, grep, test runners
- YELLOW: git, mkdir
- RED rm, sudo, curl etc.
Then writes the safe ones to your settings.json. Evidence-based, not prescriptive. We also maintain good defaults!
Tool misses - A PostToolUse hook detects "command not found" errors and BSD/GNU incompatibilities in real-time. Spots things like grep -P failing on MacOS. Once per session, suggests the fix. Installs via Homebrew and updates CLAUDE.md so Claude knows the tool exists in future.
Video transcript skill: feed it a Google Meet recording, get a markdown transcript with intelligently-placed inline screenshots at moments where the speaker says "as you can see" or "look at this."
QA follow-up skill: takes QA session documents through a 7-stage pipeline that identifies issues, investigates the codebase, filters for quality, and creates GitHub issues to track. Far easier QA!
Our data team built a Claude4Data platform with 30+ analytics skills - Snowflake queries, Gong call analysis, finance metrics, customer health reports. Sales reps, PMs, and data scientists all use it. "Friends at other tech companies are nowhere near this level of sophistication"
We automatically ship our marketplace and keep it up to date on our Macs using JAMF. We run reports on skill creation and usage, and keep an eye on quality. The most used skills have high quality evals and are reviewed regularly.
The wild thing is we're just getting started. All technical work and our entire SDLC is getting skill-ified. Remote agents will accelerate things even more.
Generated by Thread Navigator
Press ⌘ + S to quick-export