Recopilé todos los prompts de NotebookLM que se volvieron virales en Reddit, X y comunidades de investigación.
Convirtieron un simple “juguete de IA” en un arma de investigación que hace 10 horas de trabajo en 20 segundos.
16 prompts para copiar y pegar. Cero relleno.
Róbalos todos 👇
⚠️ Justo antes de empezar, para la ocasión, mis jefes @ecommartinez y @adam te regalan su guía "Guía de 100 ideas de startup innovadoras asistidas por Claude".
Está disponible gratis durante 48 horas, así que consigue tu guía aquí:
alejoxadam.beehiiv.com/c/guia-100-ide…
Está disponible gratis durante 48 horas, así que consigue tu guía aquí:
alejoxadam.beehiiv.com/c/guia-100-ide…
1/ EL PROMPT DE LAS “5 PREGUNTAS ESENCIALES”
En Reddit lo llamaron un “game changer”. Obliga a NotebookLM a extraer una estructura pedagógicamente sólida en lugar de resúmenes superficiales:
"Analyze all inputs and generate 5 essential questions that, when answered, capture the main points and core meaning of all inputs."
En Reddit lo llamaron un “game changer”. Obliga a NotebookLM a extraer una estructura pedagógicamente sólida en lugar de resúmenes superficiales:
"Analyze all inputs and generate 5 essential questions that, when answered, capture the main points and core meaning of all inputs."
2/ PROMPT DEFINITIVO PARA CLASES:
"Review all uploaded materials and generate 5 essential questions that capture the core meaning.
Focus on:
Core topics and definitions
Key concepts emphasized
Relationships between concepts
Practical applications mentioned"
"Review all uploaded materials and generate 5 essential questions that capture the core meaning.
Focus on:
Core topics and definitions
Key concepts emphasized
Relationships between concepts
Practical applications mentioned"
3/ EL PROMPT DE STEVEN JOHNSON “INTERESTING BITS”
El director de NotebookLM lo probó con 500.000 palabras de transcripciones de la NASA. Hizo 10 horas de trabajo manual en 20 segundos:
"What are the most surprising or interesting pieces of information in these sources? Include key quotes."
El director de NotebookLM lo probó con 500.000 palabras de transcripciones de la NASA. Hizo 10 horas de trabajo manual en 20 segundos:
"What are the most surprising or interesting pieces of information in these sources? Include key quotes."
4/ VERSIÓN EXTENDIDA CON DIRECCIÓN:
"I'm interested in writing about [TOPIC].
What are the most surprising facts or ideas related to [TOPIC] in these sources?
Include key quotes. Focus on [SPECIFIC ASPECT], not [OTHER ASPECTS]."
La búsqueda tradicional no puede detectar lo “interesante”. Esto sí.
"I'm interested in writing about [TOPIC].
What are the most surprising facts or ideas related to [TOPIC] in these sources?
Include key quotes. Focus on [SPECIFIC ASPECT], not [OTHER ASPECTS]."
La búsqueda tradicional no puede detectar lo “interesante”. Esto sí.
5/ FORMATO CONCURSO (Audio Overview)
A los estudiantes les encanta. La IA presenta un concurso donde se equivoca a propósito para que las correcciones se fijen mejor:
"A quiz show with two hosts. First host quizzes the second on [TOPIC]. 10 questions total. Mix of multiple choice and True/False.
The host gets answers wrong sometimes. The other corrects with right answers. Share results at the end."
A los estudiantes les encanta. La IA presenta un concurso donde se equivoca a propósito para que las correcciones se fijen mejor:
"A quiz show with two hosts. First host quizzes the second on [TOPIC]. 10 questions total. Mix of multiple choice and True/False.
The host gets answers wrong sometimes. The other corrects with right answers. Share results at the end."
6/ HACK DE PODCAST MULTILINGÜE
Antes de que existiera soporte oficial de idiomas, los usuarios generaban podcasts en español, alemán o japonés:
"This is the first international special episode of Deep Dive conducted entirely in [Language].
Special Instructions:
Only [Language] for entire duration
No English except to clarify unique terms"
Antes de que existiera soporte oficial de idiomas, los usuarios generaban podcasts en español, alemán o japonés:
"This is the first international special episode of Deep Dive conducted entirely in [Language].
Special Instructions:
Only [Language] for entire duration
No English except to clarify unique terms"
7/ PERSONA PRODUCT MANAGER (Oficial de Google)
Transforma documentos en memos de decisión:
"Act as a Lead Product Manager reviewing internal documentation. Ruthlessly scan for actionable insights, ignoring fluff.
Synthesize into 'Decision Memo' format:
User Evidence: Direct quotes indicating user problems
Feasibility Checks: Technical constraints mentioned
Blind Spots: What's missing from source text
Use bullets. If I ask vague questions, force me to clarify."
Transforma documentos en memos de decisión:
"Act as a Lead Product Manager reviewing internal documentation. Ruthlessly scan for actionable insights, ignoring fluff.
Synthesize into 'Decision Memo' format:
User Evidence: Direct quotes indicating user problems
Feasibility Checks: Technical constraints mentioned
Blind Spots: What's missing from source text
Use bullets. If I ask vague questions, force me to clarify."
8/ PERSONA INVESTIGADOR CIENTÍFICO (Oficial de Google)
Para académicos que necesitan metodología más que conclusiones:
"Act as research assistant for a senior scientist. Tone: strictly objective, formal, precise.
Assume advanced knowledge of [FIELD]. Don't define standard terminology.
Focus on methodology, data integrity, and conflicting evidence.
Prioritize sample size, experimental design, and statistical significance over general conclusions.
Format with bolded sections:
Key Findings
Methodological Strengths/Weaknesses
Contradictions"
Para académicos que necesitan metodología más que conclusiones:
"Act as research assistant for a senior scientist. Tone: strictly objective, formal, precise.
Assume advanced knowledge of [FIELD]. Don't define standard terminology.
Focus on methodology, data integrity, and conflicting evidence.
Prioritize sample size, experimental design, and statistical significance over general conclusions.
Format with bolded sections:
Key Findings
Methodological Strengths/Weaknesses
Contradictions"
9/ PERSONA PROFESOR DE SECUNDARIA (Oficial de Google)
Hace accesible contenido denso:
"Act as an engaging Middle School Teacher. Translate source documents into language a 7th grader understands.
Structure every response:
The 'tl;dr': One sentence using simple words
Analogy: Real-world metaphor for the concept
Vocab List: 3 difficult words defined simply
For dense paragraphs, break into True or False quiz format."
Hace accesible contenido denso:
"Act as an engaging Middle School Teacher. Translate source documents into language a 7th grader understands.
Structure every response:
The 'tl;dr': One sentence using simple words
Analogy: Real-world metaphor for the concept
Vocab List: 3 difficult words defined simply
For dense paragraphs, break into True or False quiz format."
10/ PROMPT DE TEMAS PARA REVISIÓN DE LITERATURA
Para investigadores que sintetizan múltiples papers:
"From papers on [TOPIC], identify 5-10 most recurring themes.
For each theme provide:
Short definition in your own words
Which papers mention it (with citations)
One sentence on how it's treated (debated, assumed, tested)
Present as structured table."
Para investigadores que sintetizan múltiples papers:
"From papers on [TOPIC], identify 5-10 most recurring themes.
For each theme provide:
Short definition in your own words
Which papers mention it (with citations)
One sentence on how it's treated (debated, assumed, tested)
Present as structured table."
11/ PROMPT PARA ENCONTRAR CONTRADICCIONES
Saca a la luz desacuerdos entre fuentes:
"From papers on [TOPIC], identify major contradictions or conflicting findings.
For each contradiction provide:
Specific claim from each side (quoted with citations)
Possible reasons for disagreement (method, sample, context)
What evidence would resolve the conflict"
Saca a la luz desacuerdos entre fuentes:
"From papers on [TOPIC], identify major contradictions or conflicting findings.
For each contradiction provide:
Specific claim from each side (quoted with citations)
Possible reasons for disagreement (method, sample, context)
What evidence would resolve the conflict"
12/ ANÁLISIS DE BRECHAS BASADO EN FUENTES
Cuando intentaste algo y no funcionó:
"Analyze this attempt against my uploaded materials:
Project: [WHAT I TRIED]
My approach: [STEPS I TOOK]
Result: [WHAT HAPPENED]
Expected: [WHAT SHOULD HAVE HAPPENED]
Cross-reference with sources:
Quote methodologies I didn't follow
Identify concepts I missed entirely
Find prerequisites I skipped
Output: 'Gap in [concept]: You missed [step], but [Source, Page X] states: '[quote]''"
Cuando intentaste algo y no funcionó:
"Analyze this attempt against my uploaded materials:
Project: [WHAT I TRIED]
My approach: [STEPS I TOOK]
Result: [WHAT HAPPENED]
Expected: [WHAT SHOULD HAVE HAPPENED]
Cross-reference with sources:
Quote methodologies I didn't follow
Identify concepts I missed entirely
Find prerequisites I skipped
Output: 'Gap in [concept]: You missed [step], but [Source, Page X] states: '[quote]''"
13/ PROMPT IMPLEMENTAR CONCEPTO
Convierte investigación en acciones concretas:
"Help me implement the concept of [TOPIC].
For each relevant source:
Quote key evidence
Connect it to other retrieved information
Note conflicting viewpoints
Provide a clear action to take
Synthesize into ordered action list with thorough, actionable steps.
Ground all points in specific quotes. Acknowledge knowledge gaps."
Convierte investigación en acciones concretas:
"Help me implement the concept of [TOPIC].
For each relevant source:
Quote key evidence
Connect it to other retrieved information
Note conflicting viewpoints
Provide a clear action to take
Synthesize into ordered action list with thorough, actionable steps.
Ground all points in specific quotes. Acknowledge knowledge gaps."
14/ PROMPT SINTETIZAR CONCEPTOS
Encuentra conexiones no obvias entre ideas:
"Synthesize the connection, however abstract, between [TOPIC 1] and [TOPIC 2].
For each relevant source:
Quote key evidence
Connect to other retrieved information
Note conflicting viewpoints
Note interesting combinations
Synthesize into clear summary focusing on connections.
Ground all points in quotes. Acknowledge gaps."
Encuentra conexiones no obvias entre ideas:
"Synthesize the connection, however abstract, between [TOPIC 1] and [TOPIC 2].
For each relevant source:
Quote key evidence
Connect to other retrieved information
Note conflicting viewpoints
Note interesting combinations
Synthesize into clear summary focusing on connections.
Ground all points in quotes. Acknowledge gaps."
15/ ANÁLISIS COMPLETO DE UN TEMA
Salida extensa y profundamente investigada:
"Provide accurate, well-reasoned information about [TOPIC].
Planning:
Essential aspects to explore?
Key questions to answer?
Existing debates or controversies?
Structure:
OVERVIEW: Summary, major concepts, current relevance
ANALYSIS: Evidence-supported discussion, examples, limitations
SOURCES: Key sources, conflicts, confidence levels
Standards:
Separate facts from interpretations
Support claims with evidence
Maintain objectivity"
Salida extensa y profundamente investigada:
"Provide accurate, well-reasoned information about [TOPIC].
Planning:
Essential aspects to explore?
Key questions to answer?
Existing debates or controversies?
Structure:
OVERVIEW: Summary, major concepts, current relevance
ANALYSIS: Evidence-supported discussion, examples, limitations
SOURCES: Key sources, conflicts, confidence levels
Standards:
Separate facts from interpretations
Support claims with evidence
Maintain objectivity"
16/ PROMPT FORMATO DEBATE
Enfrenta puntos de vista opuestos. Perfecto cuando tus fuentes discrepan:
"Generate a debate between two hosts with opposing viewpoints on [TOPIC].
Host 1 argues for [POSITION A].
Host 2 argues for [POSITION B].
They should challenge each other's points, cite specific evidence from sources, and let the listener decide who made the stronger case."
Enfrenta puntos de vista opuestos. Perfecto cuando tus fuentes discrepan:
"Generate a debate between two hosts with opposing viewpoints on [TOPIC].
Host 1 argues for [POSITION A].
Host 2 argues for [POSITION B].
They should challenge each other's points, cite specific evidence from sources, and let the listener decide who made the stronger case."
El patrón detrás de todos los prompts virales de NotebookLM:
→ Pedir citas y referencias específicas
→ Buscar contradicciones, no solo resúmenes
→ Exigir que se reconozcan vacíos
→ Forzar formatos estructurados
NotebookLM brilla cuando aprovechas su arquitectura basada en fuentes.
Guarda esto. Tu flujo de investigación no volverá a ser el mismo.
→ Pedir citas y referencias específicas
→ Buscar contradicciones, no solo resúmenes
→ Exigir que se reconozcan vacíos
→ Forzar formatos estructurados
NotebookLM brilla cuando aprovechas su arquitectura basada en fuentes.
Guarda esto. Tu flujo de investigación no volverá a ser el mismo.
¡Esto es todo amigos!
Gracias por acompañarme en este hilo
Si encontraste valor:
⚡ Sígueme para más contenido como este @SantiTorAI
🛎️ RT y Me Gusta para que más personas descubran estos consejos
Gracias por acompañarme en este hilo
Si encontraste valor:
⚡ Sígueme para más contenido como este @SantiTorAI
🛎️ RT y Me Gusta para que más personas descubran estos consejos
View Tweet
Generated by Thread Navigator
Press ⌘ + S to quick-export