View Tweet
OP is right even if their argument was amateurish: Why should phenotypically distinct populations be lumped into one species with zero taxonomic subdivisions? Plus, hybrid species exist and nobody has claimed that human races are separate species since the mid 19th century.
Sewall Wright, the guy who invented Fst, said "there is no question" that races should "be considered to be of different subspecies." Many species with a similar number of subspecies to humans have a similar Fst. Imbecile, fake biologist Marxist worm.
View Tweet
Alan Templeton is lying Race Communist, like you, like Richard Lewontin, like Franz Boas and all of these other charlatan libtard "scientists."
View Tweet
Plenty of species have lower Fst than humans (less genetic differentiation between subpopulations).
Fst of humans (5 or 6 subspecies) = ~0.15
Fst of African buffalo (5 subspecies) = 0.059
"One race, the buffalo race."
Fst of humans (5 or 6 subspecies) = ~0.15
Fst of African buffalo (5 subspecies) = 0.059
"One race, the buffalo race."
View Tweet
Generated by Thread Navigator
Press ⌘ + S to quick-export