Hi,๐Ÿ‘‹ we have updated the app and fixed multiple bugs. We are lacking funds, request to free user not to use Adblock. Ads are non intrusive. ๐Ÿ˜Š

@bryan_johnson: A new longevity stem cell ther...

@bryan_johnson
41 views Oct 04, 2025
1
A new longevity stem cell therapy in monkeys showed an estimated 3โ€“5 yrs of biological age reversal, across 54% of tissues. Scaled cautiously to humans, could correspond to ~9โ€“15 years of rejuvenation.

If this replicates, it's a big deal. ๐Ÿงต
Media image
2
What researchers did: engineered human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) with a modified FOXO3 gene (FOXO3SA2/SA2) to resist degradation.

These hESCs were then differentiated into senescence-resistant mesenchymal progenitor cells (SRCs). When injected into cynomolgus monkeys (2 million cells/kg) across various age groups, SRCs demonstrated significant rejuvenation, reversing brain atrophy, blood senescence, inflammation, and oxidative stress.

Transcriptomic and epigenetic analyses confirmed biological age reversal in organs like skin, aorta, lungs, and the digestive system.

FOXO3-enhanced senescence resistant MPCs (SRCs) consistently outperformed wild-type MPCs, producing systemic rejuvenation across brain, blood, and organs.

On average, this corresponded to estimated 3โ€“5 years of biological age reversal, across 54% of tissues (vs 31% with WTCs). Scaled cautiously to humans, this may approximate ~9โ€“15 years of rejuvenation.
3
Here are some of the effects in more detail.

SRCs = are special stem cells engineered with a FOXO3 tweak that makes them resistant to aging

WTCs = are the normal โ€œwild-typeโ€ cells without that upgrade

Brain
+ Cortical thickness and volume restored toward youthful levels: SRC up to ~50โ€“70% vs WTC ~10โ€“20% (inferred from imaging and figure analysis; not direct author statistics).
+ Hippocampus sn-transcriptAge: SRC โˆ’2.5 years (WTC not reported).
+ Cognition: significant improvement with SRC; modest effect with WTC.

Blood / Immune
+ Age-related gene programs reversed: SRC 39% (upregulated) / 30% (downregulated); WTC reversed fewer (Fig. 2Cโ€“D, no exact percentages reported).
+ Equivalent immune rejuvenation: SRC 3 years vs WTC 1.5 years (observational estimate, not author statistic).

Organs (transcriptomic & epigenomic)
+ Average transcriptomic rejuvenation: SRC โˆ’3.34 years (54% of tissues) vs WTC โˆ’2.80 years (31% of tissues).

+ Standout tissues:
โ€ข Skin: SRC โˆ’5.6 years vs WTC โˆ’4.4 years
โ€ข Lung: SRC โˆ’4.1 years vs WTC โˆ’3.3 years
โ€ข Skeletal muscle: SRC โˆ’4.9 / โˆ’3.5 years vs WTC โˆ’3.2 / โˆ’2.4 years
โ€ข Spleen: SRC โˆ’2.6 years vs WTC โˆ’1.9 years
โ€ข Hippocampus: SRC โˆ’2.0 years vs WTC โˆ’1.5 years

+ Reproductive system: Ovaries SRC โˆ’4.5 years vs WTC โˆ’3.1 years; granulosa cells showed >6 years reversal with SRC.

+ DNAmAge: Brain โˆ’5 years, skeletal muscle โˆ’4 years, spleen โˆ’2 years with SRC; WTC changes negligible.

Safety
+ Dose: 2 million cells/kg IV biweekly for 44 weeks.
+ No fevers, immune rejection, or metabolic issues in either group.
+ No tumors at the primate dose of 2 million cells/kg, or even at 10ร— higher dose (20 million cells/kg) in nude mice.
Media image
Actions
Visual Editor Carousel Maker NEW
Update Thread
What You Can Do
  • Download as PDF
  • Save to Notion
  • Export as Markdown
  • Visual Editor
  • LinkedIn & Instagram Carousel Maker
Create Free Account

Includes 7-day Premium trial